A phylogenetic classification of diatoms (Bacillariophyta)

Diatoms are known for their extraordinary species richness, cornerstone roles in aquatic ecosystems, and immense contributions to the global cycling of carbon, oxygen, and silica. For nearly 2 centuries, taxonomic classifications of diatoms have been based on interpretations of their feature-rich, silica cell walls. These classifications, in turn, have been used to make broad inferences about diatom ecology and evolution, but decades of molecular phylogenetic research have shown that historical and contemporary classification systems do not reflect evolutionary history, severely limiting their utility and insights. We took advantage of recent advances in our understanding of the diatom phylogeny to develop the first entirely natural classification of diatoms, in which only monophyletic groups have been recognized and named. The classification is comprehensive, dividing 431 genera among 68 families, 44 orders, and 10 classes. Among these, seven classes, 13 orders, three families, and one genus are proposed as new. Although the new classification includes many areas of overlap with previous systems, one principal departure is the increased number of classes, which reflects that "centric" and "araphid" diatoms are comprised of multiple lineages recognized here as distinct classes. By providing a more accurate representation of phylogenetic relationships, the proposed classification facilitates clearer communication about all aspects of diatom biology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Phycology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.70125
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Diatoms and Algae Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
45.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phylogenetic classification of diatoms (Bacillariophyta)

Andrew James Alverson, John Patrick Kociolek, Matt Peter Ashworth
2 citations
Journal of Phycology
Diatoms and Algae Research
45.28
article

A phylogenetic classification of diatoms (Bacillariophyta)

Andrew James Alverson, John Patrick Kociolek, Matt Peter Ashworth
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Diatoms are known for their extraordinary species richness, cornerstone roles in aquatic ecosystems, and immense contributions to the global cycling of carbon, oxygen, and silica. For nearly 2 centuries, taxonomic classifications of diatoms have been based on interpretations of their feature-rich, silica cell walls. These classifications, in turn, have been used to make broad inferences about diatom ecology and evolution, but decades of molecular phylogenetic research have shown that historical and contemporary classification systems do not reflect evolutionary history, severely limiting their utility and insights. We took advantage of recent advances in our understanding of the diatom phylogeny to develop the first entirely natural classification of diatoms, in which only monophyletic groups have been recognized and named. The classification is comprehensive, dividing 431 genera among 68 families, 44 orders, and 10 classes. Among these, seven classes, 13 orders, three families, and one genus are proposed as new. Although the new classification includes many areas of overlap with previous systems, one principal departure is the increased number of classes, which reflects that "centric" and "araphid" diatoms are comprised of multiple lineages recognized here as distinct classes. By providing a more accurate representation of phylogenetic relationships, the proposed classification facilitates clearer communication about all aspects of diatom biology.

Journal of PhycologyVol. 62(1)
Museum of Boulder (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Diatoms and Algae Research
45.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.