STATISTICAL SHAPE MODELLING TO COMPARE ANATOMICAL DIFFERENCES IN INDIVIDUALS WITH BILATERAL SYMPTOMATIC FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is one of the leading causes of early hip osteoarthritis and can be characterized by a bony overgrowth of the femoral head-neck junction (cam-type) and/or an overcoverage of the acetabulum (pincer-type). Although many individuals with FAI indicate these characteristic features, there are often several anatomical factors in addition to the cam deformity that may lead to earlier injury risks in either one or in potentially both of their hips. The purpose was to examine patients with bilateral symptomatic cam FAI and compare the additional anatomical variations between their larger and smaller cam deformity using multimodal statistical shape modelling. Twenty-four patients with bilateral symptomatic cam FAI (n = 24, m:f = 13:11, age = 22 ± 6 years), and fifty-four control participants (n = 54, m:f = 42:12, age = 33 ± 7 years) were included in this study. Each participant was CT scanned to confirm any bilateral cam morphology and additional anatomical measurements of the femoral neck (femoral neck-shaft angle, medial proximal femoral angle, femoral version), acetabular coverage (acetabular version, lateral centre-edge angle) and spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence) were assessed. Paired sample (larger-cam vs. smaller-cam) and independent sample t-tests (control vs. each FAI group) were performed to compare the anatomical CT measurements (CI = 95%). Each participant's hip models were segmented and imported into a statistical shape modelling program (ShapeWorks, USA) to compare the anatomical differences in mean shape models. From the imaging data, the bilateral FAI patients’ larger-cam side showed larger alpha angles compared to the contralateral smaller-cam side. The most important finding was that bilateral symptomatic FAI patients had either a large cam deformity or a combination of a smaller femoral neck-shaft angle with a small cam deformity. Injury risks and earlier symptoms could be associated with a combination of these features where a varus neck can further bring even a milder cam deformity closer to the chondrolabral junction, resulting in earlier mechanical impingement and symptoms. An anterior sacral tilt also increases anterosuperior engagement of the cam deformity and decreases posterior stability of the hip joint. These structural asymmetries and variances may lead to compensatory pelvic instability, highlighting the need for personalized surgical plans to optimize hip stability and help alleviate symptoms for potentially either or both hips.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2026.2.041
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STATISTICAL SHAPE MODELLING TO COMPARE ANATOMICAL DIFFERENCES IN INDIVIDUALS WITH BILATERAL SYMPTOMATIC FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT

G. Ng, A. Goela, C. D. Fu, J. Lin et al.
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Hip disorders and treatments
article

STATISTICAL SHAPE MODELLING TO COMPARE ANATOMICAL DIFFERENCES IN INDIVIDUALS WITH BILATERAL SYMPTOMATIC FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT

G. Ng, A. Goela, C. D. Fu, J. Lin, R. Degen
article en

Abstract

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is one of the leading causes of early hip osteoarthritis and can be characterized by a bony overgrowth of the femoral head-neck junction (cam-type) and/or an overcoverage of the acetabulum (pincer-type). Although many individuals with FAI indicate these characteristic features, there are often several anatomical factors in addition to the cam deformity that may lead to earlier injury risks in either one or in potentially both of their hips. The purpose was to examine patients with bilateral symptomatic cam FAI and compare the additional anatomical variations between their larger and smaller cam deformity using multimodal statistical shape modelling. Twenty-four patients with bilateral symptomatic cam FAI (n = 24, m:f = 13:11, age = 22 ± 6 years), and fifty-four control participants (n = 54, m:f = 42:12, age = 33 ± 7 years) were included in this study. Each participant was CT scanned to confirm any bilateral cam morphology and additional anatomical measurements of the femoral neck (femoral neck-shaft angle, medial proximal femoral angle, femoral version), acetabular coverage (acetabular version, lateral centre-edge angle) and spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence) were assessed. Paired sample (larger-cam vs. smaller-cam) and independent sample t-tests (control vs. each FAI group) were performed to compare the anatomical CT measurements (CI = 95%). Each participant's hip models were segmented and imported into a statistical shape modelling program (ShapeWorks, USA) to compare the anatomical differences in mean shape models. From the imaging data, the bilateral FAI patients’ larger-cam side showed larger alpha angles compared to the contralateral smaller-cam side. The most important finding was that bilateral symptomatic FAI patients had either a large cam deformity or a combination of a smaller femoral neck-shaft angle with a small cam deformity. Injury risks and earlier symptoms could be associated with a combination of these features where a varus neck can further bring even a milder cam deformity closer to the chondrolabral junction, resulting in earlier mechanical impingement and symptoms. An anterior sacral tilt also increases anterosuperior engagement of the cam deformity and decreases posterior stability of the hip joint. These structural asymmetries and variances may lead to compensatory pelvic instability, highlighting the need for personalized surgical plans to optimize hip stability and help alleviate symptoms for potentially either or both hips.

Orthopaedic ProceedingsVol. 108-B(SUPP_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.