Analysis of instructors’ oral feedback practices and contextual constraints in the EFL classroom: a qualitative study

Oral feedback is widely acknowledged as a powerful tool for fostering reflective and self-regulated learning. However, at Hawassa University, Ethiopia, its effective implementation remains limited. This study explore instructors’ oral feedback practices in the Communicative English Skills course and examine the contextual challenges that impede their ability to fully promote reflective and self-regulated learning environments. Adopting an interpretative paradigm and a qualitative descriptive case study design, data were collected through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with ten course instructors. The data were then transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. The findings revealed a significant gap and inconsistency among course instructors in the application of various feedback techniques aimed at fostering reflective and self-regulated learning across the observed classes. Descriptive, facilitative, and directive feedback were predominantly used, whereas motivational and peer-to-peer feedback was less common. Descriptive and directive feedback mainly focused at task and person-levels, while facilitative feedback employed at the process and self-regulatory levels. Although facilitative, motivational, and peer-to-peer feedback are theoretically more valuable to encourage self-regulated and reflective learning, the overemphasis on descriptive and directive feedback that focused on error correction and structured guidance, tended to promote student dependency on instructors’ direction. In conclusion, although instructors use a range of oral feedback techniques, contextual barriers such as large class sizes, a rigid curriculum, and limited time, hindered their ability to encourage reflective and self-regulated learning environments. This study underscores the urgent need for contextually sensitive, evidence-based strategies to support and improve instructors’ feedback practices, thereby enhancing learner autonomy in EFL classrooms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06576-7
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of instructors’ oral feedback practices and contextual constraints in the EFL classroom: a qualitative study

Mesfine Abera, Kefyalew Woreta, Taye Gebremariam
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Analysis of instructors’ oral feedback practices and contextual constraints in the EFL classroom: a qualitative study

Mesfine Abera, Kefyalew Woreta, Taye Gebremariam
article en

Abstract

Oral feedback is widely acknowledged as a powerful tool for fostering reflective and self-regulated learning. However, at Hawassa University, Ethiopia, its effective implementation remains limited. This study explore instructors’ oral feedback practices in the Communicative English Skills course and examine the contextual challenges that impede their ability to fully promote reflective and self-regulated learning environments. Adopting an interpretative paradigm and a qualitative descriptive case study design, data were collected through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with ten course instructors. The data were then transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. The findings revealed a significant gap and inconsistency among course instructors in the application of various feedback techniques aimed at fostering reflective and self-regulated learning across the observed classes. Descriptive, facilitative, and directive feedback were predominantly used, whereas motivational and peer-to-peer feedback was less common. Descriptive and directive feedback mainly focused at task and person-levels, while facilitative feedback employed at the process and self-regulatory levels. Although facilitative, motivational, and peer-to-peer feedback are theoretically more valuable to encourage self-regulated and reflective learning, the overemphasis on descriptive and directive feedback that focused on error correction and structured guidance, tended to promote student dependency on instructors’ direction. In conclusion, although instructors use a range of oral feedback techniques, contextual barriers such as large class sizes, a rigid curriculum, and limited time, hindered their ability to encourage reflective and self-regulated learning environments. This study underscores the urgent need for contextually sensitive, evidence-based strategies to support and improve instructors’ feedback practices, thereby enhancing learner autonomy in EFL classrooms.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 13(1)
Hawassa University (ET), Wolaita Sodo University (ET)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.