Intersectional Course Redesign

In this article, we offer a practical guide to support higher education faculty in conducting team-based, intersectionally conscious course redesign in special education teacher preparation programs. Rooted in intersectionality and Disability Studies in Education (DSE) theory, this article offers strategies for evaluating and transforming course content to better prepare preservice teachers to serve diverse learners. Seven phases structure the process: (1) identifying collaborators, (2) organizing roles and workflow, (3) reviewing current content, (4) engaging in individual reflection, (5) engaging in discourse, (6) developing new content, and (7) evaluating revisions. Drawing on intersectionality scholarship, our approach addresses how faculty positionalities, power dynamics, and systemic inequities shape curriculum. It also responds to political resistance to equity, diversity, inclusion, and access by providing actionable strategies to counter deficit-based models and center marginalized voices. Illustrative examples from two redesign projects demonstrate how intersectionality can be enacted as praxis throughout the process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Special Education Preparation
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33043/cyf2772tktc
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectional Course Redesign

Lydia Ocasio-Stoutenburg, Mildred Boveda, Nayma Sultana Mim, Kelsey Steffen
Journal of Special Education Preparation
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Intersectional Course Redesign

Lydia Ocasio-Stoutenburg, Mildred Boveda, Nayma Sultana Mim, Kelsey Steffen
article en

Abstract

In this article, we offer a practical guide to support higher education faculty in conducting team-based, intersectionally conscious course redesign in special education teacher preparation programs. Rooted in intersectionality and Disability Studies in Education (DSE) theory, this article offers strategies for evaluating and transforming course content to better prepare preservice teachers to serve diverse learners. Seven phases structure the process: (1) identifying collaborators, (2) organizing roles and workflow, (3) reviewing current content, (4) engaging in individual reflection, (5) engaging in discourse, (6) developing new content, and (7) evaluating revisions. Drawing on intersectionality scholarship, our approach addresses how faculty positionalities, power dynamics, and systemic inequities shape curriculum. It also responds to political resistance to equity, diversity, inclusion, and access by providing actionable strategies to counter deficit-based models and center marginalized voices. Illustrative examples from two redesign projects demonstrate how intersectionality can be enacted as praxis throughout the process.

Journal of Special Education Preparation
Pennsylvania State University (US), Ball State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.