Sustainability Reporting in the Spotlight: Exploring Evidence from Nike’s Corporate Reports

This study provides a critical examination of Nike’s sustainability reporting by comparing disclosures across six major frameworks: the Higg Index, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the Triple Bottom Line (TBL), and Double Materiality. Drawing on a directed content analysis of Nike’s 2022–2023 sustainability documents, the research codes and compares how these frameworks are applied to environmental, social, and governance topics. The analysis shows that Nike’s environmental reporting is the most consistent and well-developed across the six frameworks. In contrast, significant gaps and inconsistencies remain in areas such as labor rights, living wages, and supply chain transparency. These findings reveal both the advantages and the tensions that come with using multiple frameworks, illustrating where they reinforce one another and where they diverge. Overall, the study highlights the essential need for harmonized reporting practices across the global apparel sector. It also reflects both the strengths and the limitations of using multiple frameworks to produce sustainability reports that are transparent and comprehensive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting and Auditing
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/accountaudit2010003
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability Reporting in the Spotlight: Exploring Evidence from Nike’s Corporate Reports

Iva Jestratijević, Mozhgan Soltanisehat
Accounting and Auditing
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Sustainability Reporting in the Spotlight: Exploring Evidence from Nike’s Corporate Reports

Iva Jestratijević, Mozhgan Soltanisehat
article en

Abstract

This study provides a critical examination of Nike’s sustainability reporting by comparing disclosures across six major frameworks: the Higg Index, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the Triple Bottom Line (TBL), and Double Materiality. Drawing on a directed content analysis of Nike’s 2022–2023 sustainability documents, the research codes and compares how these frameworks are applied to environmental, social, and governance topics. The analysis shows that Nike’s environmental reporting is the most consistent and well-developed across the six frameworks. In contrast, significant gaps and inconsistencies remain in areas such as labor rights, living wages, and supply chain transparency. These findings reveal both the advantages and the tensions that come with using multiple frameworks, illustrating where they reinforce one another and where they diverge. Overall, the study highlights the essential need for harmonized reporting practices across the global apparel sector. It also reflects both the strengths and the limitations of using multiple frameworks to produce sustainability reports that are transparent and comprehensive.

Accounting and AuditingVol. 2(1)
University of North Texas (US), University of Georgia (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sustainability Reporting in the Spotlight: Exploring Evidence from Nike’s Corporate Reports — Iva Jestratijević, Mozhgan Soltanisehat · Accounting and Auditing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS