Plasma exchange combined with anti-B-cell therapy enables comparable outcomes between DSA-positive and DSA-negative aplastic anemia after haplo-HSCT: a propensity-score-matched cohort study

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for aplastic anemia (AA). For patients lacking a matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD), haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) has become an alternative with comparable efficacy. However, donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) remain the principal barrier. In this study, we compared transplant outcomes in DSA-positive recipients after desensitization with plasma exchange (PE) combined with anti-B-cell therapy. Between January 2019 and December 2023, we enrolled 30 DSA-positive AA patients who underwent haplo-HSCT at our center. All received a desensitization regimen combining PE with anti-B-cell agents. By propensity-score matching (1:2 ratio, caliper 0.02), we additionally enrolled 60 DSA-negative controls matched for key clinical variables to compare therapeutic efficacy and long-term outcomes between the two groups. This study enrolled 90 AA patients who underwent haplo-HSCT: 30 were DSA-positive and 60 were DSA-negative. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. After desensitization with PE combined with anti-B-cell agents, the DSA-positive group achieved outcomes equivalent to those of the DSA-negative group. Specifically, EBV reactivation (46.7% vs. 68.3%; P = 0.002) was significantly better in the DSA-positive group. Engraftment, aGVHD, Effacacy, OS, and GRFS rates were similar between two groups. However, the risk of cGVHD remains higher in the DSA-positive group (40% vs. 12%; P = 0.009). For DSA-positive AA patients who are candidates for haplo-HSCT and for whom no DSA-negative donor can be identified, desensitization with PE combined with anti-B-cell agents represents an established strategy to improve transplant outcomes; nevertheless, close surveillance for cGVHD is warranted after transplantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Hematology
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-026-06815-6
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plasma exchange combined with anti-B-cell therapy enables comparable outcomes between DSA-positive and DSA-negative aplastic anemia after haplo-HSCT: a propensity-score-matched cohort study

Dijiong Wu, Liqiang Wu, Baodong Ye, Jinyu Hu et al.
Annals of Hematology
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

Plasma exchange combined with anti-B-cell therapy enables comparable outcomes between DSA-positive and DSA-negative aplastic anemia after haplo-HSCT: a propensity-score-matched cohort study

Dijiong Wu, Liqiang Wu, Baodong Ye, Jinyu Hu, Qinghong Yu, Huijin Hu, Zhengwei Tan, Yuechao Zhao, Wenbin Liu, Tonglin Hu, Yu Zhang
article en

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for aplastic anemia (AA). For patients lacking a matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD), haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) has become an alternative with comparable efficacy. However, donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) remain the principal barrier. In this study, we compared transplant outcomes in DSA-positive recipients after desensitization with plasma exchange (PE) combined with anti-B-cell therapy. Between January 2019 and December 2023, we enrolled 30 DSA-positive AA patients who underwent haplo-HSCT at our center. All received a desensitization regimen combining PE with anti-B-cell agents. By propensity-score matching (1:2 ratio, caliper 0.02), we additionally enrolled 60 DSA-negative controls matched for key clinical variables to compare therapeutic efficacy and long-term outcomes between the two groups. This study enrolled 90 AA patients who underwent haplo-HSCT: 30 were DSA-positive and 60 were DSA-negative. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. After desensitization with PE combined with anti-B-cell agents, the DSA-positive group achieved outcomes equivalent to those of the DSA-negative group. Specifically, EBV reactivation (46.7% vs. 68.3%; P = 0.002) was significantly better in the DSA-positive group. Engraftment, aGVHD, Effacacy, OS, and GRFS rates were similar between two groups. However, the risk of cGVHD remains higher in the DSA-positive group (40% vs. 12%; P = 0.009). For DSA-positive AA patients who are candidates for haplo-HSCT and for whom no DSA-negative donor can be identified, desensitization with PE combined with anti-B-cell agents represents an established strategy to improve transplant outcomes; nevertheless, close surveillance for cGVHD is warranted after transplantation.

Annals of HematologyVol. 105(3)
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Jining Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.