Omni Geometry Representation Learning Versus Large Language Models for Geospatial Entity Resolution

ABSTRACT The development, integration, and maintenance of geospatial databases rely heavily on efficient and accurate matching procedures of Geospatial Entity Resolution (ER). While resolution of points‐of‐interest (POIs) has been widely addressed, resolution of entities with diverse geometries has been largely overlooked. This is partly due to the lack of a uniform technique for embedding heterogeneous geometries seamlessly into a neural network framework. Existing neural approaches simplify complex geometries to a single point, resulting in significant loss of spatial information. To address this limitation, we propose Omni, a geospatial ER model featuring an omni‐geometry encoder. This encoder is capable of embedding point, line, polyline, polygon, and multi‐polygon geometries, enabling the model to capture the complex geospatial intricacies of the places being compared. Furthermore, Omni leverages transformer‐based pre‐trained language models over individual textual attributes of place records in an Attribute Affinity mechanism. The model is rigorously tested on existing point‐only datasets and a new diverse‐geometry geospatial ER dataset. Omni produces up to 12% (F1) improvement over existing methods. Furthermore, we test the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to conduct geospatial ER, experimenting with prompting strategies and learning scenarios, comparing the results of pre‐trained language model‐based methods with LLMs. Results indicate that LLMs show competitive results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions in GIS
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.70199
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Omni Geometry Representation Learning Versus Large Language Models for Geospatial Entity Resolution

Kalana Wijegunarathna, CJ Jones, Kristin Stock
Transactions in GIS
Geographic Information Systems Studies
article

Omni Geometry Representation Learning Versus Large Language Models for Geospatial Entity Resolution

Kalana Wijegunarathna, CJ Jones, Kristin Stock
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The development, integration, and maintenance of geospatial databases rely heavily on efficient and accurate matching procedures of Geospatial Entity Resolution (ER). While resolution of points‐of‐interest (POIs) has been widely addressed, resolution of entities with diverse geometries has been largely overlooked. This is partly due to the lack of a uniform technique for embedding heterogeneous geometries seamlessly into a neural network framework. Existing neural approaches simplify complex geometries to a single point, resulting in significant loss of spatial information. To address this limitation, we propose Omni, a geospatial ER model featuring an omni‐geometry encoder. This encoder is capable of embedding point, line, polyline, polygon, and multi‐polygon geometries, enabling the model to capture the complex geospatial intricacies of the places being compared. Furthermore, Omni leverages transformer‐based pre‐trained language models over individual textual attributes of place records in an Attribute Affinity mechanism. The model is rigorously tested on existing point‐only datasets and a new diverse‐geometry geospatial ER dataset. Omni produces up to 12% (F1) improvement over existing methods. Furthermore, we test the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to conduct geospatial ER, experimenting with prompting strategies and learning scenarios, comparing the results of pre‐trained language model‐based methods with LLMs. Results indicate that LLMs show competitive results.

Transactions in GISVol. 30(1)
Massey University (NZ), Cardiff University (GB)
Massey University, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.