Attention Control and Working Memory, Varying Definitions and Measurements

The goal of the current review is to present a general review of the literature regarding the relationship between attention control and working memory, particularly focusing on how the two concepts are defined and experimentally measured. We also hope to convince the reader that working memory, as a broad concept, should be viewed as a hierarchical model comprising working memory capacity and attention control. In the extant literature, researchers have struggled with disentangling the two highly correlated constructs. In particular, attention control has been difficult to define because many papers use the same term to refer to different interpretations of the construct, or simply include it as part of working memory more broadly. Furthermore, multiple definitions of working memory have been presented and, as often as not, no definition is provided when researchers include working memory in their investigations. We hope to at least provide a useful overview of these multifaceted constructs and perhaps a usable framework for studying working memory and attention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cognitive Sciences
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijcs2010004
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attention Control and Working Memory, Varying Definitions and Measurements

Christopher A. Was, Daniel Byrnes
International Journal of Cognitive Sciences
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Attention Control and Working Memory, Varying Definitions and Measurements

Christopher A. Was, Daniel Byrnes
article en

Abstract

The goal of the current review is to present a general review of the literature regarding the relationship between attention control and working memory, particularly focusing on how the two concepts are defined and experimentally measured. We also hope to convince the reader that working memory, as a broad concept, should be viewed as a hierarchical model comprising working memory capacity and attention control. In the extant literature, researchers have struggled with disentangling the two highly correlated constructs. In particular, attention control has been difficult to define because many papers use the same term to refer to different interpretations of the construct, or simply include it as part of working memory more broadly. Furthermore, multiple definitions of working memory have been presented and, as often as not, no definition is provided when researchers include working memory in their investigations. We hope to at least provide a useful overview of these multifaceted constructs and perhaps a usable framework for studying working memory and attention.

International Journal of Cognitive SciencesVol. 2(1)
Kent State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Attention Control and Working Memory, Varying Definitions and Measurements — Christopher A. Was, Daniel Byrnes · International Journal of Cognitive Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS