How microrobots should be translated: A clinical and value‐centered readiness framework

Abstract Untethered mobile milli/microrobots hold transformative potential for interventional medicine by enabling more precise and entirely non‐invasive diagnosis and therapy. Realizing this promise requires bridging the gap between groundbreaking laboratory demonstrations and successful clinical integration. Despite remarkable technical progress over the past two decades, most millirobots and microrobots remain confined to laboratory proof‐of‐concept demonstrations, with limited real‐world feasibility. Here, we identify key factors that slow translation from bench to bedside, focusing on the disconnect between technical innovation and meaningful patient outcomes. We argue that the long‐term impact and sustainability of the field depend on aligning development with unmet clinical needs, demonstrating feasibility, value and integration potential into existing clinical workflows. To foster translational research of milli/microrobots, we introduce a strategic milli/microrobot Technology Readiness Level framework (mTRL), which maps system development from initial conceptualization to clinical adoption through clearly defined milestones and their associated stepwise activities. The mTRL model provides a structured gauge of technological maturity, a common language for multi‐disciplinary collaboration and actionable guidance to accelerate translational development toward new, safer and more efficient interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.70112
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Micro and Nano Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How microrobots should be translated: A clinical and value‐centered readiness framework

Dietmar W. Hutmacher, Hakan Ceylan, Sanjay Misra, Edoardo Sinibaldi et al.
1 citations
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Micro and Nano Robotics
26.95
article

How microrobots should be translated: A clinical and value‐centered readiness framework

Dietmar W. Hutmacher, Hakan Ceylan, Sanjay Misra, Edoardo Sinibaldi, Pankaj J. Pasricha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Untethered mobile milli/microrobots hold transformative potential for interventional medicine by enabling more precise and entirely non‐invasive diagnosis and therapy. Realizing this promise requires bridging the gap between groundbreaking laboratory demonstrations and successful clinical integration. Despite remarkable technical progress over the past two decades, most millirobots and microrobots remain confined to laboratory proof‐of‐concept demonstrations, with limited real‐world feasibility. Here, we identify key factors that slow translation from bench to bedside, focusing on the disconnect between technical innovation and meaningful patient outcomes. We argue that the long‐term impact and sustainability of the field depend on aligning development with unmet clinical needs, demonstrating feasibility, value and integration potential into existing clinical workflows. To foster translational research of milli/microrobots, we introduce a strategic milli/microrobot Technology Readiness Level framework (mTRL), which maps system development from initial conceptualization to clinical adoption through clearly defined milestones and their associated stepwise activities. The mTRL model provides a structured gauge of technological maturity, a common language for multi‐disciplinary collaboration and actionable guidance to accelerate translational development toward new, safer and more efficient interventions.

Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Mayo Clinic (US), Australian Research Council (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Italian Institute of Technology (IT), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
American Heart Association, Queensland University of Technology, National Institutes of Health, Australian Research Council, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Micro and Nano Robotics
26.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.