Reproductive coercion experienced by women living with HIV – a global scoping review

Biomedical advancements in HIV prevention and treatment have provided opportunities for women living with HIV to move through pregnancy, give birth, and breastfeed while effectively removing the risk of vertical transmission of HIV to their child. However, existing evidence suggests that the reproductive health and rights of women living with HIV are threatened through coercive practices in healthcare settings because of their HIV status. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesise evidence and identify gaps in the literature on reproductive coercion experienced by women living with HIV in clinical settings. This review focused specifically on reproductive coercion in the context of clinical healthcare globally, as opposed to intimate partnerships, and included forced or covertly performed sterilisation, forced abortion, restricted or forced contraceptive methods, forced or denied caesarean sections, and general coercion by healthcare providers regarding fertility-, sexual-, and reproductive-related decision-making. We searched three databases (Embase, PubMed, and LILACS) for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies. After 2888 unique publications were screened, thirteen publications met the inclusion criteria. Sterilisation was the most common coercion type assessed, and Mexico, the United States, and South Africa were common study settings. Variation in reproductive coercion definitions, study methods, and reporting was observed. Evidence from these studies suggests that reproductive coercion among women living with HIV is severe and pervasive. Therefore, there is a need to expand research on coercion and stigma that women living with HIV face while navigating reproductive healthcare. Additionally, prevention mechanisms and resource expansion for survivors beyond legal settings should be implemented globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2588004
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive coercion experienced by women living with HIV – a global scoping review

Carlos Garcia de Leon Moreno, Omar Syarif, G Turpin, Immaculate B Owomugisha et al.
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Reproductive coercion experienced by women living with HIV – a global scoping review

Carlos Garcia de Leon Moreno, Omar Syarif, G Turpin, Immaculate B Owomugisha, Keren Dunaway, Laurel Dawn Sprague, S Brion, Pim Looze, Charity T. Mkona, Olena Stryzhak, Daria Ocheret, Jean de Dieu Anoubissi, Global Scan Committee, Carrie Lyons, Althea Wolfe, Diana Weekes, Stefan Baral, Uma Bhatt, Danielle Lonbong Nijometio, Fletcher Chiu, Katherine Rucinski
article en

Abstract

Biomedical advancements in HIV prevention and treatment have provided opportunities for women living with HIV to move through pregnancy, give birth, and breastfeed while effectively removing the risk of vertical transmission of HIV to their child. However, existing evidence suggests that the reproductive health and rights of women living with HIV are threatened through coercive practices in healthcare settings because of their HIV status. The objective of this scoping review was to synthesise evidence and identify gaps in the literature on reproductive coercion experienced by women living with HIV in clinical settings. This review focused specifically on reproductive coercion in the context of clinical healthcare globally, as opposed to intimate partnerships, and included forced or covertly performed sterilisation, forced abortion, restricted or forced contraceptive methods, forced or denied caesarean sections, and general coercion by healthcare providers regarding fertility-, sexual-, and reproductive-related decision-making. We searched three databases (Embase, PubMed, and LILACS) for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies. After 2888 unique publications were screened, thirteen publications met the inclusion criteria. Sterilisation was the most common coercion type assessed, and Mexico, the United States, and South Africa were common study settings. Variation in reproductive coercion definitions, study methods, and reporting was observed. Evidence from these studies suggests that reproductive coercion among women living with HIV is severe and pervasive. Therefore, there is a need to expand research on coercion and stigma that women living with HIV face while navigating reproductive healthcare. Additionally, prevention mechanisms and resource expansion for survivors beyond legal settings should be implemented globally.

Sexual and Reproductive Health MattersVol. 33(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of the Southern Caribbean (TT), International Community of Women Living with HIV (UG), Positive Action (US), Global Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (NL), Youth Development (US), Computer Emergency Response Team (FR), Centre for Social Justice (GB), Institute for Christian Works (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.