Bodies of Knowledge: Material Practices of Reproductive Resistance

This paper explores how embodied practices such as traditional midwifery, herbal contraception and self-managed abortion networks operate as critical forms of reproductive resistance. In contexts where formal healthcare systems are inaccessible, coercive or culturally alienating, these material practices offer alternative routes to bodily autonomy. Drawing on decolonial feminist theory, the paper interrogates how such practices challenge state control, biopolitical regulation and medicalised narratives of reproductive health. Through case studies from Latin America, the Global South and the Global North, the paper highlights the knowledge systems sustained by women, queer communities and traditional practitioners in resisting colonial and patriarchal control over fertility and birth. It also explores how these practices form counter-publics rooted in care, solidarity and ancestral knowledge, even when operating in the shadows of legality or legitimacy. This paper asks: what happens when resistance is not a public spectacle but a quiet, embodied routine? And how do such practices complicate mainstream feminist and human rights discourses that centre legality and access over autonomy and tradition?

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London)
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25501/soas.00874295
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bodies of Knowledge: Material Practices of Reproductive Resistance

Necqursha Kaloo
SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London)
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Bodies of Knowledge: Material Practices of Reproductive Resistance

Necqursha Kaloo
article en

Abstract

This paper explores how embodied practices such as traditional midwifery, herbal contraception and self-managed abortion networks operate as critical forms of reproductive resistance. In contexts where formal healthcare systems are inaccessible, coercive or culturally alienating, these material practices offer alternative routes to bodily autonomy. Drawing on decolonial feminist theory, the paper interrogates how such practices challenge state control, biopolitical regulation and medicalised narratives of reproductive health. Through case studies from Latin America, the Global South and the Global North, the paper highlights the knowledge systems sustained by women, queer communities and traditional practitioners in resisting colonial and patriarchal control over fertility and birth. It also explores how these practices form counter-publics rooted in care, solidarity and ancestral knowledge, even when operating in the shadows of legality or legitimacy. This paper asks: what happens when resistance is not a public spectacle but a quiet, embodied routine? And how do such practices complicate mainstream feminist and human rights discourses that centre legality and access over autonomy and tradition?

SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.