Methodological review of the level of statistical support declared in radiological research articles

Some radiological researchers may underestimate the complexities of statistical analysis and requirement for specialist statistical support, which risks inappropriate analyses and misleading results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Radiology
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqag026
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological review of the level of statistical support declared in radiological research articles

Sue Mallett, Tom Parry, Amisha Pradhan
British Journal of Radiology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Methodological review of the level of statistical support declared in radiological research articles

Sue Mallett, Tom Parry, Amisha Pradhan
article en

Abstract

Some radiological researchers may underestimate the complexities of statistical analysis and requirement for specialist statistical support, which risks inappropriate analyses and misleading results.

British Journal of Radiology
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.