Safety and Efficacy of CT-Guided Lung Biopsy in Elderly Patients age 75 Years and Older: A Single-Centre Retrospective Comparative Study

IntroductionCT-guided biopsy has good diagnostic accuracy, but adverse events such as pneumothorax are common. There are few reports on the safety and efficacy of CT-guided biopsy in the elderly.MethodsThis was a retrospective single-centre cohort study. Patients who underwent CT-guided lung biopsy between February 2017 and August 2024 were included. Patient background, disease background, examination status, and adverse events were ascertained. Elderly were defined as those aged 75 years and older. The primary outcome was the incidence of all adverse events, and the secondary outcomes were the incidence of pneumothorax and diagnostic accuracy. Categorical variables were compared by Chi-square test, and continuous variables by t-test. Multivariable analysis was performed by logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, lung comorbidities, and radiological findings of target lesion.ResultsThere were significant differences between the two groups in ECOG-PS and the distance from the surface to pleura and target. In the primary outcome, any adverse events occurred in 207 patients (56.2%), with no significant difference between elderly (97/180, 53.9%) and non-elderly (110/188, 58.5%) patients (<i>p</i> = 0.401). Pneumothorax was the most common adverse event, occurring in 151 (41.0%) patients, with no significant difference between elderly (68/180, 37.8%) and non-elderly (83/188, 44.1%) (<i>p</i> = 0.244). On multivariate analysis, elderly (75years or older) was not clearly associated with the occurrence of all or severe adverse events, pneumothorax, and confirmed diagnosis. Location in the lower lung field and distant from the pleura were significantly associated with the incidence of all adverse event. In the secondary outcomes, emphysema or interstitial pneumonia, location in the lower lung field, and distant from the pleura were significantly associated with pneumothorax. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy disease between the elderly and non-elderly patients.ConclusionsThe incidence of adverse events and diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided biopsy are similar in elderly and non-elderly patients, and this method is useful even in elderly patients.<b>Key point</b>The safety and efficacy of CT-guided lung biopsy in elderly patients are equivalent to those in non-elderly patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338261421282
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and Efficacy of CT-Guided Lung Biopsy in Elderly Patients age 75 Years and Older: A Single-Centre Retrospective Comparative Study

Osamu Kanai, Takuma Imakita, Kohei Fujita, Takanori Ito et al.
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Safety and Efficacy of CT-Guided Lung Biopsy in Elderly Patients age 75 Years and Older: A Single-Centre Retrospective Comparative Study

Osamu Kanai, Takuma Imakita, Kohei Fujita, Takanori Ito, Yuta Okada, Shogo Toyama, Saiki Yoshimura, Naoki Fujimoto, Issei Oi, Kiminobu Tanizawa
article en

Abstract

IntroductionCT-guided biopsy has good diagnostic accuracy, but adverse events such as pneumothorax are common. There are few reports on the safety and efficacy of CT-guided biopsy in the elderly.MethodsThis was a retrospective single-centre cohort study. Patients who underwent CT-guided lung biopsy between February 2017 and August 2024 were included. Patient background, disease background, examination status, and adverse events were ascertained. Elderly were defined as those aged 75 years and older. The primary outcome was the incidence of all adverse events, and the secondary outcomes were the incidence of pneumothorax and diagnostic accuracy. Categorical variables were compared by Chi-square test, and continuous variables by t-test. Multivariable analysis was performed by logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, lung comorbidities, and radiological findings of target lesion.ResultsThere were significant differences between the two groups in ECOG-PS and the distance from the surface to pleura and target. In the primary outcome, any adverse events occurred in 207 patients (56.2%), with no significant difference between elderly (97/180, 53.9%) and non-elderly (110/188, 58.5%) patients (<i>p</i> = 0.401). Pneumothorax was the most common adverse event, occurring in 151 (41.0%) patients, with no significant difference between elderly (68/180, 37.8%) and non-elderly (83/188, 44.1%) (<i>p</i> = 0.244). On multivariate analysis, elderly (75years or older) was not clearly associated with the occurrence of all or severe adverse events, pneumothorax, and confirmed diagnosis. Location in the lower lung field and distant from the pleura were significantly associated with the incidence of all adverse event. In the secondary outcomes, emphysema or interstitial pneumonia, location in the lower lung field, and distant from the pleura were significantly associated with pneumothorax. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy disease between the elderly and non-elderly patients.ConclusionsThe incidence of adverse events and diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided biopsy are similar in elderly and non-elderly patients, and this method is useful even in elderly patients.<b>Key point</b>The safety and efficacy of CT-guided lung biopsy in elderly patients are equivalent to those in non-elderly patients.

Technology in Cancer Research & TreatmentVol. 25
Kyoto Medical Center (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.