Washed Microbiota Transplantation Using Ileocolic Transendoscopic Enteral Tubing Versus Basic Treatments for Intestinal Inflammatory Obstruction in Crohn's Disease: A Multicenter Concurrent Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT Background Surgical intervention becomes necessary when conservative treatments fail in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) complicated by intestinal obstruction. Given the limited therapeutic alternatives, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) compared with conventional basic treatment in managing intestinal inflammatory obstruction in CD. Methods In this multicenter, nonrandomized, and concurrent controlled trial, patients with active CD and radiologically confirmed intestinal inflammatory obstruction were enrolled. The WMT group underwent WMT following basic treatment during hospitalization, whereas the non‐WMT group underwent basic treatment alone. Propensity score matching (1:2) was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the obstruction improvement rate at 28 days, with follow‐up continuing until surgery or 3 months post‐discharge. Results Between March 2018 and March 2024, 48 patients were analyzed after matching, with 16 in the WMT group and 32 in the non‐WMT group. The 28‐day obstruction improvement rate was significantly higher in the WMT group (93.8% vs. 65.6%, p = 0.021). For secondary outcomes, the WMT group showed more favorable trends in 14‐day improvement, as well as in clinical remission and surgery rates assessed at 1 and 3 months after discharge, respectively. In contrast, the obstruction remission rate at 1 month post‐discharge was slightly higher in the non‐WMT group. However, none of these differences reached statistical significance. No severe adverse events occurred in the WMT group. Conclusion WMT using ileocolic transendoscopic enteral tubing (TET) offers a safe and effective option bridging surgical intervention and conservative treatments in the management of CD with complicated intestinal inflammatory obstruction. Trail Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01793831, February 2013

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbiota Medicine Research
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mmr3.70002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Washed Microbiota Transplantation Using Ileocolic Transendoscopic Enteral Tubing Versus Basic Treatments for Intestinal Inflammatory Obstruction in Crohn's Disease: A Multicenter Concurrent Controlled Trial

You Yu, FaMing Zhang, Sibusiso Luthuli, W. Wang et al.
1 citations
Microbiota Medicine Research
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
30.93
article

Washed Microbiota Transplantation Using Ileocolic Transendoscopic Enteral Tubing Versus Basic Treatments for Intestinal Inflammatory Obstruction in Crohn's Disease: A Multicenter Concurrent Controlled Trial

You Yu, FaMing Zhang, Sibusiso Luthuli, W. Wang, Chengran Wang, Hao Wang, Fan Xu, Zhaoyang Zhao, Xinlu Jin, Bota Cui, Quan Wen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Surgical intervention becomes necessary when conservative treatments fail in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) complicated by intestinal obstruction. Given the limited therapeutic alternatives, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) compared with conventional basic treatment in managing intestinal inflammatory obstruction in CD. Methods In this multicenter, nonrandomized, and concurrent controlled trial, patients with active CD and radiologically confirmed intestinal inflammatory obstruction were enrolled. The WMT group underwent WMT following basic treatment during hospitalization, whereas the non‐WMT group underwent basic treatment alone. Propensity score matching (1:2) was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the obstruction improvement rate at 28 days, with follow‐up continuing until surgery or 3 months post‐discharge. Results Between March 2018 and March 2024, 48 patients were analyzed after matching, with 16 in the WMT group and 32 in the non‐WMT group. The 28‐day obstruction improvement rate was significantly higher in the WMT group (93.8% vs. 65.6%, p = 0.021). For secondary outcomes, the WMT group showed more favorable trends in 14‐day improvement, as well as in clinical remission and surgery rates assessed at 1 and 3 months after discharge, respectively. In contrast, the obstruction remission rate at 1 month post‐discharge was slightly higher in the non‐WMT group. However, none of these differences reached statistical significance. No severe adverse events occurred in the WMT group. Conclusion WMT using ileocolic transendoscopic enteral tubing (TET) offers a safe and effective option bridging surgical intervention and conservative treatments in the management of CD with complicated intestinal inflammatory obstruction. Trail Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01793831, February 2013

Microbiota Medicine Research
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Xuzhou Medical College (CN), Second People’s Hospital of Huai’an (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN), Ospedale Monaldi (IT)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nanjing Medical University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
30.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.