Finite-difference frequency domain electromagnetics with the void space domain decomposition method

The finite-difference frequency domain (FDFD) method has received increasing interest, owing to its ability to provide useful information for inverse design. Here, I introduce a new algorithm that provides FDFD solutions, the void space domain decomposition (VSDD) method. It features solve speeds comparable to those of the finite-difference time domain (FDTD) method, but enables domains 10 times larger or more with typical compute configurations. With VSDD, there is no need to solve a matrix equation that spans the entire problem domain. The network bandwidth requirement, a key limitation of FDTD, is reduced by about a factor of 35 or more, even though both algorithms require comparable numbers of voxel operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optics Express
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.579109
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite-difference frequency domain electromagnetics with the void space domain decomposition method

Thomas Baehr-Jones
Optics Express
Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
article

Finite-difference frequency domain electromagnetics with the void space domain decomposition method

Thomas Baehr-Jones
article en

Abstract

The finite-difference frequency domain (FDFD) method has received increasing interest, owing to its ability to provide useful information for inverse design. Here, I introduce a new algorithm that provides FDFD solutions, the void space domain decomposition (VSDD) method. It features solve speeds comparable to those of the finite-difference time domain (FDTD) method, but enables domains 10 times larger or more with typical compute configurations. With VSDD, there is no need to solve a matrix equation that spans the entire problem domain. The network bandwidth requirement, a key limitation of FDTD, is reduced by about a factor of 35 or more, even though both algorithms require comparable numbers of voxel operations.

Optics ExpressVol. 34(4)
Tessella (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.