Comparison of Viral Infection Rates after T-cell Depletion in Pediatric HCT: Alemtuzumab Vs Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Alemtuzumab and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) are T-cell depletion approaches utilized in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT). These strategies carry a risk of viral reactivations and infections. Direct comparative studies between alemtuzumab and PTCy in children are limited. This study evaluates the incidence of viral infections within one year following HCT for each strategy. We performed a retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent allogeneic HCT at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) between 6/1/2018 – 9/30/2024, receiving either alemtuzumab or PTCy for in vivo T-cell depletion at first transplant. Collected data included patient and transplant characteristics, pre-transplant serologies, antiviral prophylaxis, and post-transplant viral infections. Viral infections were defined as detectable viral RNA/DNA in blood or tissue, excluding results below the limit of quantification. Follow-up extended to one year post-HCT or until subsequent cytotoxic therapy, transfer, or death. The primary endpoint was total viral infection incidence at one year; secondary endpoints included individual viral infections. BlueSky was used for statistical analysis. Twenty-eight patients met inclusion criteria (20 alemtuzumab, 8 PTCy). The alemtuzumab group was younger (median 7.7 vs 13.9 years) and, as expected, primarily received MUD transplants (85%), while the PTCy group mainly received haploidentical transplants (63%); letermovir use was similar between groups (Table 1). At one year, the total viral infection incidence did not differ significantly (alemtuzumab 65% vs PTCy 50%; p=0.67), nor did incidences of specific viral infections (Figures 1 and 2). Among CMV-seropositive patients in the whole cohort, CMV reactivation was numerically lower with letermovir as compared to no prophylaxis (36% vs 67%; p=0.37). In this pediatric HCT cohort, viral infection rates were comparable between alemtuzumab and PTCy. Despite the small sample size, both T-cell depletion approaches appear to pose comparable infectious risks, supporting tailored platform choice based on donor and clinical factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2025.12.901
Primary Topic
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Viral Infection Rates after T-cell Depletion in Pediatric HCT: Alemtuzumab Vs Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Anand Srinivasan, Paul J. Galardy, Alexis Kuhn, Mira A. Kohorst et al.
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
article

Comparison of Viral Infection Rates after T-cell Depletion in Pediatric HCT: Alemtuzumab Vs Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Anand Srinivasan, Paul J. Galardy, Alexis Kuhn, Mira A. Kohorst, Asmaa Ferdjallah, Catherine Martin
article en

Abstract

Alemtuzumab and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) are T-cell depletion approaches utilized in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants (HCT). These strategies carry a risk of viral reactivations and infections. Direct comparative studies between alemtuzumab and PTCy in children are limited. This study evaluates the incidence of viral infections within one year following HCT for each strategy. We performed a retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent allogeneic HCT at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) between 6/1/2018 – 9/30/2024, receiving either alemtuzumab or PTCy for in vivo T-cell depletion at first transplant. Collected data included patient and transplant characteristics, pre-transplant serologies, antiviral prophylaxis, and post-transplant viral infections. Viral infections were defined as detectable viral RNA/DNA in blood or tissue, excluding results below the limit of quantification. Follow-up extended to one year post-HCT or until subsequent cytotoxic therapy, transfer, or death. The primary endpoint was total viral infection incidence at one year; secondary endpoints included individual viral infections. BlueSky was used for statistical analysis. Twenty-eight patients met inclusion criteria (20 alemtuzumab, 8 PTCy). The alemtuzumab group was younger (median 7.7 vs 13.9 years) and, as expected, primarily received MUD transplants (85%), while the PTCy group mainly received haploidentical transplants (63%); letermovir use was similar between groups (Table 1). At one year, the total viral infection incidence did not differ significantly (alemtuzumab 65% vs PTCy 50%; p=0.67), nor did incidences of specific viral infections (Figures 1 and 2). Among CMV-seropositive patients in the whole cohort, CMV reactivation was numerically lower with letermovir as compared to no prophylaxis (36% vs 67%; p=0.37). In this pediatric HCT cohort, viral infection rates were comparable between alemtuzumab and PTCy. Despite the small sample size, both T-cell depletion approaches appear to pose comparable infectious risks, supporting tailored platform choice based on donor and clinical factors.

Transplantation and Cellular TherapyVol. 32(2)
Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.