Skills or credentials? How skill specific and standardized vocational training moderates the wages of occupational mismatches

This article examines the relationship between institutional features of vocational education and wage outcomes following occupational mismatches using a multidimensional mismatch framework. Drawing on German administrative data for early‑career male VET graduates, the analysis assesses how two institutional dimensions, training standardization and skill specificity, relate to wage returns for horizontal, vertical, and full mismatches. The results show that higher standardization negatively moderates wage outcomes for horizontal and full mismatches, while greater skill specificity is linked to reduced transferability and increases wage penalties for vertical mismatches. Individuals in full mismatches experience large baseline penalties that appear less conditioned by institutional features. Horizontal mismatches do not show wage penalties when multiple mismatch dimensions are considered simultaneously. These findings suggest that distinct institutional features of the training system, credential verification and skill transferability, relate to mismatch outcomes and contribute to stratification in early‑career wages. • Education characteristics moderate wage penalties of multidimensional mismatches. • Skill-specific training limits transferability, exacerbating wage penalties of mismatches. • Standardized credentials increase wage penalties for horizontal mismatches while mitigating those for vertical mismatches. • Full mismatches result in severe wage penalties, independent of institutionalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2026.101136
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Skills or credentials? How skill specific and standardized vocational training moderates the wages of occupational mismatches

Kevin Alan Franz Ruf
Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
article

Skills or credentials? How skill specific and standardized vocational training moderates the wages of occupational mismatches

Kevin Alan Franz Ruf
article en

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between institutional features of vocational education and wage outcomes following occupational mismatches using a multidimensional mismatch framework. Drawing on German administrative data for early‑career male VET graduates, the analysis assesses how two institutional dimensions, training standardization and skill specificity, relate to wage returns for horizontal, vertical, and full mismatches. The results show that higher standardization negatively moderates wage outcomes for horizontal and full mismatches, while greater skill specificity is linked to reduced transferability and increases wage penalties for vertical mismatches. Individuals in full mismatches experience large baseline penalties that appear less conditioned by institutional features. Horizontal mismatches do not show wage penalties when multiple mismatch dimensions are considered simultaneously. These findings suggest that distinct institutional features of the training system, credential verification and skill transferability, relate to mismatch outcomes and contribute to stratification in early‑career wages. • Education characteristics moderate wage penalties of multidimensional mismatches. • Skill-specific training limits transferability, exacerbating wage penalties of mismatches. • Standardized credentials increase wage penalties for horizontal mismatches while mitigating those for vertical mismatches. • Full mismatches result in severe wage penalties, independent of institutionalization.

Research in Social Stratification and MobilityVol. 102
Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.