Difficulty and Complications of Lead Extraction—Is ICD Lead Design Important?

1. ICD lead implant duration was 3.17 years shorter and perhaps for this reason ICD lead extraction was often less difficult, the procedure less complex and MC significantly rare (0.75%) in comparison with PM lead extraction (2.55%). There were no differences between groups matched according to age of extracted lead. Achieving of complete procedural success was lower in PM lead extraction both in entire as in matched group of patients. 2. There were no significant differences in the complexity of TLE procedures or the incidence of major complications depending on ICD lead manufacturer, despite the fact that Biotronik leads were 16-19 months older. 3. The extraction of Abbot and Biotronik leads was associated with a lower rate of complete procedural success (by 2.13% and 2.80%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70144
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Difficulty and Complications of Lead Extraction—Is ICD Lead Design Important?

Paweł Stefańczyk, Wojciech Jacheć, Dorota Nowosielecka, Andrzej Kutarski et al.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Difficulty and Complications of Lead Extraction—Is ICD Lead Design Important?

Paweł Stefańczyk, Wojciech Jacheć, Dorota Nowosielecka, Andrzej Kutarski, Łukasz Tułecki
article en

Abstract

1. ICD lead implant duration was 3.17 years shorter and perhaps for this reason ICD lead extraction was often less difficult, the procedure less complex and MC significantly rare (0.75%) in comparison with PM lead extraction (2.55%). There were no differences between groups matched according to age of extracted lead. Achieving of complete procedural success was lower in PM lead extraction both in entire as in matched group of patients. 2. There were no significant differences in the complexity of TLE procedures or the incidence of major complications depending on ICD lead manufacturer, despite the fact that Biotronik leads were 16-19 months older. 3. The extraction of Abbot and Biotronik leads was associated with a lower rate of complete procedural success (by 2.13% and 2.80%).

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Medical University of Silesia (PL), University of Management and Administration in Zamosc (PL), John Paul II Hospital (PL), State Higher School of Vocational Education in Zamość (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Difficulty and Complications of Lead Extraction—Is ICD Lead Design Important? — Paweł Stefańczyk, Wojciech Jacheć, et al. · Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS