Rethinking forest governance during a "second war" in British Columbia's woods: a Collaborative Action Framework

There are persistent conflicts in British Columbia over logging in old growth forests. This study traces the development of a Collaborative Action Framework (CAF) process during the Fairy Creek forest conflict in British Columbia in 2020–2021. The CAF process involved a twoday summit, where more than 80 participants from First Nations, industry, academia, unions, government, and nongovernment organisations developed a vision for the province's forests to 2070. During the summit, six working groups were established to carry the work forward, and build strategies for achieving the 2070 vision. This paper focuses on the Forest Governance Working Group (FGWG), which was chaired by a First Nations leader. This study presents the design and outputs of the CAF and FGWG processes, which sought to inform forest policy and mitigate the risk for other forest conflicts in the province. These processes did not occur in a vacuum, and both inspired and were shaped by a multitude of forest co-governance and power sharing initiatives between First Nations and the government across the province.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Forestry Review
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1505/146554825840679880
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking forest governance during a "second war" in British Columbia's woods: a Collaborative Action Framework

William Nikolakis, JL Innes
The International Forestry Review
Forest Management and Policy
article

Rethinking forest governance during a "second war" in British Columbia's woods: a Collaborative Action Framework

William Nikolakis, JL Innes
article en

Abstract

There are persistent conflicts in British Columbia over logging in old growth forests. This study traces the development of a Collaborative Action Framework (CAF) process during the Fairy Creek forest conflict in British Columbia in 2020–2021. The CAF process involved a twoday summit, where more than 80 participants from First Nations, industry, academia, unions, government, and nongovernment organisations developed a vision for the province's forests to 2070. During the summit, six working groups were established to carry the work forward, and build strategies for achieving the 2070 vision. This paper focuses on the Forest Governance Working Group (FGWG), which was chaired by a First Nations leader. This study presents the design and outputs of the CAF and FGWG processes, which sought to inform forest policy and mitigate the risk for other forest conflicts in the province. These processes did not occur in a vacuum, and both inspired and were shaped by a multitude of forest co-governance and power sharing initiatives between First Nations and the government across the province.

The International Forestry ReviewVol. 27(4)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.