A Record Correction of the Thannhauser Surname

This publication constitutes a formal historical record correction regarding the origin, lineage authority, and later administrative usage of the Thannhauser surname and its variants. Issued by the Thannhauser Foundation (January 2026), the correction distinguishes medieval estate-based surname origin from post-feudal, post-marital, and bureaucratic surname appropriation in the nineteenth century. It addresses the Loew–Thannhauser case as a structural example of derivative surname usage and clarifies the limits of genealogical and representational authority attached to later name-bearing. The correction is evidentiary in nature and grounded in primary jurisdictional, ecclesiastical, and genealogical documentation. It does not contest legal name usage, personal identity, or institutional stewardship. It is open to documentary rebuttal based on contradictory primary-source evidence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18473771
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Record Correction of the Thannhauser Surname

Thannhauser
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

A Record Correction of the Thannhauser Surname

Thannhauser
article en

Abstract

This publication constitutes a formal historical record correction regarding the origin, lineage authority, and later administrative usage of the Thannhauser surname and its variants. Issued by the Thannhauser Foundation (January 2026), the correction distinguishes medieval estate-based surname origin from post-feudal, post-marital, and bureaucratic surname appropriation in the nineteenth century. It addresses the Loew–Thannhauser case as a structural example of derivative surname usage and clarifies the limits of genealogical and representational authority attached to later name-bearing. The correction is evidentiary in nature and grounded in primary jurisdictional, ecclesiastical, and genealogical documentation. It does not contest legal name usage, personal identity, or institutional stewardship. It is open to documentary rebuttal based on contradictory primary-source evidence.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.