Environmental DNA (eDNA) and Field Surveys as Complementary Tools for the Biomonitoring of Amphibian Communities

ABSTRACT Amphibians are facing large population declines as a result of both natural and anthropogenic threats. Reconstructing and understanding the composition and structure of amphibian communities is essential for developing effective monitoring and conservation strategies. In this study, we compared environmental DNA metabarcoding (eDNA‐MB) data with a comprehensive dataset obtained from acoustic and visual encounter surveys (AVES) in a set of Mediterranean ponds. Additionally, we designed and validated a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay for the Iberian ribbed newt ( Pleurodeles waltl ) and tested its ability with eDNA‐MB and AVES in assessing the presence and population densities of this species. Our findings provide evidence that eDNA‐MB can be a valuable method for reconstructing the composition and structure of amphibian communities. eDNA‐MB identified all expected amphibian species from the regional species pool, including some that were missed in traditional surveys. Although eDNA‐MB abundance estimations for P. waltl seemed virtually independent of population densities obtained through field surveys, we found a significant association between eDNA concentration (qPCR) and AVES abundance estimates. Our findings suggest that effective strategies for amphibian biomonitoring need the combination of community data obtained from both traditional and eDNA surveys, especially in the Mediterranean region where strong environmental constraints can affect the detection and persistence of eDNA in freshwater ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.70328
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental DNA (eDNA) and Field Surveys as Complementary Tools for the Biomonitoring of Amphibian Communities

Luís Albero, Eloy Becares, Alejandro Nistal‐García, Pedro García‐García et al.
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Environmental DNA (eDNA) and Field Surveys as Complementary Tools for the Biomonitoring of Amphibian Communities

Luís Albero, Eloy Becares, Alejandro Nistal‐García, Pedro García‐García, Jorge García‐Girón
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Amphibians are facing large population declines as a result of both natural and anthropogenic threats. Reconstructing and understanding the composition and structure of amphibian communities is essential for developing effective monitoring and conservation strategies. In this study, we compared environmental DNA metabarcoding (eDNA‐MB) data with a comprehensive dataset obtained from acoustic and visual encounter surveys (AVES) in a set of Mediterranean ponds. Additionally, we designed and validated a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay for the Iberian ribbed newt ( Pleurodeles waltl ) and tested its ability with eDNA‐MB and AVES in assessing the presence and population densities of this species. Our findings provide evidence that eDNA‐MB can be a valuable method for reconstructing the composition and structure of amphibian communities. eDNA‐MB identified all expected amphibian species from the regional species pool, including some that were missed in traditional surveys. Although eDNA‐MB abundance estimations for P. waltl seemed virtually independent of population densities obtained through field surveys, we found a significant association between eDNA concentration (qPCR) and AVES abundance estimates. Our findings suggest that effective strategies for amphibian biomonitoring need the combination of community data obtained from both traditional and eDNA surveys, especially in the Mediterranean region where strong environmental constraints can affect the detection and persistence of eDNA in freshwater ecosystems.

Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater EcosystemsVol. 36(2)
Biodiversity Research Institute (US), Universidad de León (ES), University of Oulu (FI)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.