Open strategy as institutional work

Purpose This article positions institutional work as a central construct in open strategy research. While open strategy is widely celebrated for fostering transparency and inclusion, its potential as a mechanism for field-level institutional change remains underexplored. The study examines how managed openness enabled UK universities to perform institutional work that reshaped research culture and institutional logics in response to evolving field expectations around equality, diversity, and transparency. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on 17 in-depth interviews with senior leaders and 25 documentary sources from the N8 group of UK research-intensive universities, the study applies the Gioia methodology and critical discourse analysis to trace how open strategy practices were mobilized to enact institutional work. The analysis identifies three interrelated processes – motivating, signaling, and enacting – through which openness was purposefully managed to facilitate cultural and institutional transformation. Findings Open strategy practices operated as discursive, symbolic, and material mechanisms of institutional work. By framing change imperatives, demonstrating commitment, and empowering participation, leaders used managed openness to align organizational practices with emergent field-level logics. These processes culminated in research culture action plans that institutionalized new norms of transparency and inclusion across the N8 universities. Originality/value The article advances open strategy theory by establishing institutional work as a powerful lens for understanding how openness extends beyond organizational boundaries to orchestrate field-level change. It also introduces institutional critique as a precursor to institutional work, highlighting the role of elite actors and discursive legitimation in shaping openness as a strategic and institutional practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategy and Leadership
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-10-2025-0355
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open strategy as institutional work

Tom McGovern, Mairi Maclean, Charles Edward Harvey, Elie Chahda
Strategy and Leadership
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Open strategy as institutional work

Tom McGovern, Mairi Maclean, Charles Edward Harvey, Elie Chahda
article en

Abstract

Purpose This article positions institutional work as a central construct in open strategy research. While open strategy is widely celebrated for fostering transparency and inclusion, its potential as a mechanism for field-level institutional change remains underexplored. The study examines how managed openness enabled UK universities to perform institutional work that reshaped research culture and institutional logics in response to evolving field expectations around equality, diversity, and transparency. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on 17 in-depth interviews with senior leaders and 25 documentary sources from the N8 group of UK research-intensive universities, the study applies the Gioia methodology and critical discourse analysis to trace how open strategy practices were mobilized to enact institutional work. The analysis identifies three interrelated processes – motivating, signaling, and enacting – through which openness was purposefully managed to facilitate cultural and institutional transformation. Findings Open strategy practices operated as discursive, symbolic, and material mechanisms of institutional work. By framing change imperatives, demonstrating commitment, and empowering participation, leaders used managed openness to align organizational practices with emergent field-level logics. These processes culminated in research culture action plans that institutionalized new norms of transparency and inclusion across the N8 universities. Originality/value The article advances open strategy theory by establishing institutional work as a powerful lens for understanding how openness extends beyond organizational boundaries to orchestrate field-level change. It also introduces institutional critique as a precursor to institutional work, highlighting the role of elite actors and discursive legitimation in shaping openness as a strategic and institutional practice.

Strategy and Leadership
University of Bath (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Open strategy as institutional work — Tom McGovern, Mairi Maclean, et al. · Strategy and Leadership (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS