Experimental and numerical assessment of near-field exposure of a 60 GHZ communication antenna

We simulated the mm-wave exposure of a real 60 GHz communication module and validated it using near-field measurements in terms of the incident power density. Next, we numerically evaluated the absorbed power density in a layered tissue model using the finite-difference time-domain technique. The worst-case and realistic exposures were compared with the latest guidelines of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The worst-case exposure complied with the exposure guidelines for a distance larger than 14.5 mm. Realistic exposure is application dependent and exceeded the limits specified by exposure guidelines for data-intensive applications with duty cycle of 90% at distances smaller than 10.6 mm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncag007
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and numerical assessment of near-field exposure of a 60 GHZ communication antenna

Guy Torfs, Piet Demeester, Günter Vermeeren, N. Kuster et al.
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
article

Experimental and numerical assessment of near-field exposure of a 60 GHZ communication antenna

Guy Torfs, Piet Demeester, Günter Vermeeren, N. Kuster, Lennart Martens, Björn Debaillie, Wout Joseph, Sven Kühn
article en

Abstract

We simulated the mm-wave exposure of a real 60 GHz communication module and validated it using near-field measurements in terms of the incident power density. Next, we numerically evaluated the absorbed power density in a layered tissue model using the finite-difference time-domain technique. The worst-case and realistic exposures were compared with the latest guidelines of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The worst-case exposure complied with the exposure guidelines for a distance larger than 14.5 mm. Realistic exposure is application dependent and exceeded the limits specified by exposure guidelines for data-intensive applications with duty cycle of 90% at distances smaller than 10.6 mm.

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Imec the Netherlands (NL), Ghent University (BE), Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society (CH), IMEC (BE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Experimental and numerical assessment of near-field exposure of a 60 GHZ communication antenna — Guy Torfs, Piet Demeester, et al. · Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS