Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: Are we ready for routine use?

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is increasingly used for the evaluation of parenchymal liver disease, with recent multicenter data demonstrating high diagnostic yield and a low rate of serious adverse events. While EUS-LB offers technical flexibility through different needle sizes, suction techniques, and limited passes, its overall diagnostic outcomes, including specimen length, portal tract count, and sample adequacy, are comparable to standard percutaneous liver biopsy. Despite these encouraging results, EUS-LB is more invasive, requiring sedation and endoscopic expertise, and is substantially more costly than percutaneous-liver biopsy. Therefore, while EUS-LB is valuable in select clinical scenarios, current evidence does not support its routine use for parenchymal liver disease, and further prospective studies are needed to define its role relative to established percutaneous approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v18.i2.116625
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: Are we ready for routine use?

Ilaria Tarantino, Filippo Antonini, Andrea Anderloni, Antonio Facciorusso et al.
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: Are we ready for routine use?

Ilaria Tarantino, Filippo Antonini, Andrea Anderloni, Antonio Facciorusso, Carlo Fabbri
article en

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is increasingly used for the evaluation of parenchymal liver disease, with recent multicenter data demonstrating high diagnostic yield and a low rate of serious adverse events. While EUS-LB offers technical flexibility through different needle sizes, suction techniques, and limited passes, its overall diagnostic outcomes, including specimen length, portal tract count, and sample adequacy, are comparable to standard percutaneous liver biopsy. Despite these encouraging results, EUS-LB is more invasive, requiring sedation and endoscopic expertise, and is substantially more costly than percutaneous-liver biopsy. Therefore, while EUS-LB is valuable in select clinical scenarios, current evidence does not support its routine use for parenchymal liver disease, and further prospective studies are needed to define its role relative to established percutaneous approaches.

World Journal of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 18(2)
University of Salento (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Nini Hospital (LB), Istituto Oncologico Romagnolo (IT), Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT), Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: Are we ready for routine use? — Ilaria Tarantino, Filippo Antonini, et al. · World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS