Marriage with First-Degree Relatives in Ancient Iran: A Historical Reassessment of a Prevailing Claim

Abstract This article critically reassesses the widespread claim that marriages with first-degree relatives were socially accepted and prevalent in ancient Iran. Through a textual analysis of late Pahlavi sources, an examination of their post-Sasanian transmission under conditions of political and religious domination, and a review of authoritative scholarship in Iranian and Zoroastrian studies, the study demonstrates that this allegation lacks historical and social credibility. The concept commonly cited in support of this claim is shown to be theological and idealized rather than descriptive of actual social practice. The article further argues that ideological reinterpretation, selective transmission, and polemical misuse of late sources played a decisive role in the formation and persistence of this accusation. The Persian (Farsi) version of this article is available online at: [https://zenodo.org/records/18379973]

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18473861
Primary Topic
Eurasian Exchange Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marriage with First-Degree Relatives in Ancient Iran: A Historical Reassessment of a Prevailing Claim

Faramarz Tabesh
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Eurasian Exchange Networks
article

Marriage with First-Degree Relatives in Ancient Iran: A Historical Reassessment of a Prevailing Claim

Faramarz Tabesh
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article critically reassesses the widespread claim that marriages with first-degree relatives were socially accepted and prevalent in ancient Iran. Through a textual analysis of late Pahlavi sources, an examination of their post-Sasanian transmission under conditions of political and religious domination, and a review of authoritative scholarship in Iranian and Zoroastrian studies, the study demonstrates that this allegation lacks historical and social credibility. The concept commonly cited in support of this claim is shown to be theological and idealized rather than descriptive of actual social practice. The article further argues that ideological reinterpretation, selective transmission, and polemical misuse of late sources played a decisive role in the formation and persistence of this accusation. The Persian (Farsi) version of this article is available online at: [https://zenodo.org/records/18379973]

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Eurasian Exchange Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.