Neurodiversity-Affirming Principles in Oncology Treatment: A Lived-Experience Case Study.

Cancer care, with its complex and variable protocols, frequent appointments, and high-stress, may present additional challenges for neurodivergent patients, and suitable care accommodations are necessary. Yet, a dearth of literature and an associated understanding on neuro-inclusive cancer care exists. The current case study aims to: (1) explore and identify barriers and challenges to neurodivergent cancer care; and (2) generate neuro-inclusive oncology-specific recommendations to guide healthcare providers in offering neuro-affirming care. To do this, we present the first author's lived experience navigating stage IV breast cancer as a neurodivergent individual and psychologist, exploring barriers and challenges encountered. Her personal and professional experience uniquely positions her to offer insights into this intersection. Based on her experience, and complemented by published data, we generate recommendations for neuro-inclusive care. Challenges and barriers identified include limited oncology provider knowledge, awareness, and tolerance of neurodivergence, and insufficient suitable accommodations to difficulties with standard care practices. Recommendations encompass six domains: patient communication, physical environments, physical pain, administrative approaches, technology usage, and systemic revisions. Clinical, training, and research recommendations and implications are reported. Clinical implications include raising awareness around the lack of neurodivergent-affirming cancer care. We highlight the need for neuro-inclusive training for all staff interacting with neurodivergent patients. Such training should be embedded into graduate programs and professional development. We call for co-designed training (development and delivery) and research, and highlight the lack of current available research. We note the need for empirically driven universal guidelines for neuro-inclusive oncology care, which we hope will be informed by the present study.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.126472
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurodiversity-Affirming Principles in Oncology Treatment: A Lived-Experience Case Study.

Malini Dey, Matthew C. Fysh, Jessica E. Opie, Carrie Allison et al.
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

Neurodiversity-Affirming Principles in Oncology Treatment: A Lived-Experience Case Study.

Malini Dey, Matthew C. Fysh, Jessica E. Opie, Carrie Allison, David Laplante, Elizabeth Weir
article en

Abstract

Cancer care, with its complex and variable protocols, frequent appointments, and high-stress, may present additional challenges for neurodivergent patients, and suitable care accommodations are necessary. Yet, a dearth of literature and an associated understanding on neuro-inclusive cancer care exists. The current case study aims to: (1) explore and identify barriers and challenges to neurodivergent cancer care; and (2) generate neuro-inclusive oncology-specific recommendations to guide healthcare providers in offering neuro-affirming care. To do this, we present the first author's lived experience navigating stage IV breast cancer as a neurodivergent individual and psychologist, exploring barriers and challenges encountered. Her personal and professional experience uniquely positions her to offer insights into this intersection. Based on her experience, and complemented by published data, we generate recommendations for neuro-inclusive care. Challenges and barriers identified include limited oncology provider knowledge, awareness, and tolerance of neurodivergence, and insufficient suitable accommodations to difficulties with standard care practices. Recommendations encompass six domains: patient communication, physical environments, physical pain, administrative approaches, technology usage, and systemic revisions. Clinical, training, and research recommendations and implications are reported. Clinical implications include raising awareness around the lack of neurodivergent-affirming cancer care. We highlight the need for neuro-inclusive training for all staff interacting with neurodivergent patients. Such training should be embedded into graduate programs and professional development. We call for co-designed training (development and delivery) and research, and highlight the lack of current available research. We note the need for empirically driven universal guidelines for neuro-inclusive oncology care, which we hope will be informed by the present study.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.