Metacognition in Decision-Making Across Domains and Modalities: Evidence From Three Studies

Metacognition involves second-order judgments about first-order judgments. It remains unclear whether an individual's confidence in being correct is generated by the same system across tasks (<i>domain generality</i>) or whether it is computed independently in the context of each task (<i>domain specificity</i>). Previous studies have focused on correlations across several tasks, yet the evidence is mixed, and more complex models of domain generality were not taken into account. Analyzing data from 10 tasks collected across three studies in Denmark and Poland (<i>N</i> = 253-547 adult participants), we found a fixed pattern of cross-task correlations for both metacognitive bias and metacognitive efficiency. In accordance with previous studies, we found that hierarchical estimation of metacognitive efficiency led to higher correlations. We used confirmatory factor analyses to investigate the existence of general processes. We found evidence for a weak domain generality with a metacognitive module for perceptual tasks and another for cognitive tasks.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Science
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976251415354
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metacognition in Decision-Making Across Domains and Modalities: Evidence From Three Studies

Psychological Science
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Metacognition in Decision-Making Across Domains and Modalities: Evidence From Three Studies

article en

Abstract

Metacognition involves second-order judgments about first-order judgments. It remains unclear whether an individual's confidence in being correct is generated by the same system across tasks (<i>domain generality</i>) or whether it is computed independently in the context of each task (<i>domain specificity</i>). Previous studies have focused on correlations across several tasks, yet the evidence is mixed, and more complex models of domain generality were not taken into account. Analyzing data from 10 tasks collected across three studies in Denmark and Poland (<i>N</i> = 253-547 adult participants), we found a fixed pattern of cross-task correlations for both metacognitive bias and metacognitive efficiency. In accordance with previous studies, we found that hierarchical estimation of metacognitive efficiency led to higher correlations. We used confirmatory factor analyses to investigate the existence of general processes. We found evidence for a weak domain generality with a metacognitive module for perceptual tasks and another for cognitive tasks.

Psychological ScienceVol. 37(2)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Aarhus University (DK), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology (CZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.