Exploring the Boundaries of Section 61 of the United Kingdom Sale of Goods Act 1979, Prior to the Textual Amendment

Abstract Section 61 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 defines specific goods as “goods identified and agreed upon at the time of contracting.” This definition was later expanded by the textual amendment introduced through the Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1995 to include “an undivided share in an identified bulk.” The existing literature is not clear on the precise identification needed for goods to be deemed “specific.” The case law remains too fact-specific and provides only a fact-specific standard. After examining existing definitions and interpretations, the author proposes a refined definition for “specific goods,” according to which “specific goods” should be understood as “goods identified to such an extent that, if they were sold to a third party or lost, the buyer would be able to definitively recognise the goods as theirs.” Any broader or vaguer interpretation would risk obscuring the meaning of Section 61 and undermine its clarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Business
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/law-2025-0004
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Boundaries of Section 61 of the United Kingdom Sale of Goods Act 1979, Prior to the Textual Amendment

Dinushi Tennekoon Palawatta
Law and Business
European and International Contract Law
article

Exploring the Boundaries of Section 61 of the United Kingdom Sale of Goods Act 1979, Prior to the Textual Amendment

Dinushi Tennekoon Palawatta
article en

Abstract

Abstract Section 61 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 defines specific goods as “goods identified and agreed upon at the time of contracting.” This definition was later expanded by the textual amendment introduced through the Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1995 to include “an undivided share in an identified bulk.” The existing literature is not clear on the precise identification needed for goods to be deemed “specific.” The case law remains too fact-specific and provides only a fact-specific standard. After examining existing definitions and interpretations, the author proposes a refined definition for “specific goods,” according to which “specific goods” should be understood as “goods identified to such an extent that, if they were sold to a third party or lost, the buyer would be able to definitively recognise the goods as theirs.” Any broader or vaguer interpretation would risk obscuring the meaning of Section 61 and undermine its clarity.

Law and BusinessVol. 5(1)
Open University of Sri Lanka (LK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.