Reply to: Comment on Room-temperature spontaneous superradiance from single diamond nanocrystals

We argue that the comparisons in the Matters Arising comment 1 are not relevant, as they are based on equations in the Supplementary Information of ref. 2 that contained critical typos.Additionally, we find that the proposed modification to the dephasing coefficient is incorrect, with the coefficient we used initially being the correct one.We resimulate the cases from the comment and find no unphysical behavior.In the publication 2 , evidence of superradiant fluorescence from NV centres in diamond is reported.This observation followed earlier work 3 from the same lab using similar nanodiamond samples that were optically trapped and demonstrated cooperatively enhanced atomic forces.The rate equations and fluorescence equation, as written in our Supplementary Information (SI) contained several typos.