Qualitative tools to understand the capability, opportunity and motivation behind researcher behaviour: a scoping review

Abstract Qualitative approaches provide valuable tools to explore complex behaviors, and the meta-research field is increasingly using behavioural science frameworks to examine researcher behaviour. This scoping review aimed to map and present available information on qualitative data collection instruments developed to assess researcher capability, opportunity and motivation. We applied a search strategy following PRESS principles across six major databases and a dissertations repository. The review selected 27 publications, of which 81.5% were published open access. We were able to access 89% of the data collection instruments. Although most studies (93%) developed their own instruments, only 35% mentioned a validation or pilot testing strategy. All 27 studies used behavioural models in tool development, with 85% using them to present results, 78% in the discussion and 59% in their theoretical framework. However, critical limitations persist in transparency and the deep integration of theory into research practices. These findings highlight the urgent need for clearer guidelines and higher standards in the design, reporting, and sharing of qualitative tools to strengthen data quality and transferability. The study protocol was registered and is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4KWTD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251476
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Qualitative tools to understand the capability, opportunity and motivation behind researcher behaviour: a scoping review

Arthur Thives Mello, Dayanne da Silva Borges, Giovanna Mozzaquattro Nascimento, Erasmo Benício Santos de Moraes Trindade et al.
Royal Society Open Science
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Qualitative tools to understand the capability, opportunity and motivation behind researcher behaviour: a scoping review

Arthur Thives Mello, Dayanne da Silva Borges, Giovanna Mozzaquattro Nascimento, Erasmo Benício Santos de Moraes Trindade, Giovanna Medeiros Rataichesck Fiates, Anice Milbratz de Camargo, Luana Pucci de Lima
article en

Abstract

Abstract Qualitative approaches provide valuable tools to explore complex behaviors, and the meta-research field is increasingly using behavioural science frameworks to examine researcher behaviour. This scoping review aimed to map and present available information on qualitative data collection instruments developed to assess researcher capability, opportunity and motivation. We applied a search strategy following PRESS principles across six major databases and a dissertations repository. The review selected 27 publications, of which 81.5% were published open access. We were able to access 89% of the data collection instruments. Although most studies (93%) developed their own instruments, only 35% mentioned a validation or pilot testing strategy. All 27 studies used behavioural models in tool development, with 85% using them to present results, 78% in the discussion and 59% in their theoretical framework. However, critical limitations persist in transparency and the deep integration of theory into research practices. These findings highlight the urgent need for clearer guidelines and higher standards in the design, reporting, and sharing of qualitative tools to strengthen data quality and transferability. The study protocol was registered and is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4KWTD.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 13(2)
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Region Västra Götaland (SE), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Santa Catarina (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.