Comparative Study of Different FEM‐Based Delamination Modeling Techniques for Mechanically Coupled Laminated Composite Beams

ABSTRACT The aim of this work is to study the fracture behavior of carbon/epoxy laminated composite beams with different stacking sequences. Two numerical techniques were employed to model delamination: the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT) and surface‐based cohesive zone modeling (CZM). These numerical models rely on the finite element method using Abaqus/CAE. The specimens were loaded in accordance with the double cantilever beam (DCB) loading scheme commonly used to determine Mode I fracture properties. The compliance‐based beam method (CBBM) was employed as a data reduction scheme. This method is based on the equivalent crack length concept and provides the evolution of the strain energy release rate (SERR) under predominant Mode I loading ( G I ) without measuring the crack length. Numerical results for coupled beams were compared against experimental data. The results are in good agreement in the first part of the load–displacement curve. During damage propagation, the curves differ due to the presence of the fiber‐bridging phenomenon in the experimental tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.70196
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Different FEM‐Based Delamination Modeling Techniques for Mechanically Coupled Laminated Composite Beams

Hubert Dębski, Jakub Paśnik, Sylwester Samborski, Marcelo F. S. F. de Moura et al.
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
article

Comparative Study of Different FEM‐Based Delamination Modeling Techniques for Mechanically Coupled Laminated Composite Beams

Hubert Dębski, Jakub Paśnik, Sylwester Samborski, Marcelo F. S. F. de Moura, Patryk Różyło
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this work is to study the fracture behavior of carbon/epoxy laminated composite beams with different stacking sequences. Two numerical techniques were employed to model delamination: the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT) and surface‐based cohesive zone modeling (CZM). These numerical models rely on the finite element method using Abaqus/CAE. The specimens were loaded in accordance with the double cantilever beam (DCB) loading scheme commonly used to determine Mode I fracture properties. The compliance‐based beam method (CBBM) was employed as a data reduction scheme. This method is based on the equivalent crack length concept and provides the evolution of the strain energy release rate (SERR) under predominant Mode I loading ( G I ) without measuring the crack length. Numerical results for coupled beams were compared against experimental data. The results are in good agreement in the first part of the load–displacement curve. During damage propagation, the curves differ due to the presence of the fiber‐bridging phenomenon in the experimental tests.

Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & StructuresVol. 49(4)
Universidade do Porto (PT), Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Study of Different FEM‐Based Delamination Modeling Techniques for Mechanically Coupled Laminated Composite Beams — Hubert Dębski, Jakub Paśnik, et al. · Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS