(O-02) Diversity in focus: attitudes of healthcare professionals in welcoming LGBTQIA+ individuals in a university hospital setting

Abstract Introduction The lack of familiarity with evidence-based terminologies and practices in LGBTQIA+ healthcare generates discomfort and conflicts in the doctor–patient relationship. This study aimed to describe attitudes, familiarity with LGBTQIA+ rights, and the ability to provide welcoming care among professionals trained in a university hospital. Methods A cross-sectional study among medical residents, preceptors, and faculty members of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School at the University of São Paulo. Duplicate responses were excluded. Results A total of 123 responses were elegible. The median age was 29 years (IQR: 27–44); 93.5% were physicians, with a median of four years since graduation (IQR: 2–19). Most respondents were residents (62.6%), female (52.0%), White (82.9%), Christian (56.1%), and single (57.7%). Almost all reported feeling comfortable with LGBTQIA+ students (n = 122). Regarding terminology use, 81.3% felt confident using it; 89.4% stated they use the social name; and 78.1% reported no difficulties with pronouns. Additionally, 87.8% supported the inclusion of LGBTQIA+ topics in formal education. On the other hand, 44.7% reported discomfort with the use of gender-neutral language; 9.8% with admitting patients to wards according to their lived gender; and 12.2% with the use of restrooms according to gender identity. Nine participants (7.3%) believed that the presence of trans women or travestis in women’s restrooms increases the risk of violence against cisgender women. Furthermore, 22.8% believed that the media can influence the development of sexual orientation or gender identity. A minority believed that the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) should not provide gender-affirming treatments (4.9%) or reproductive technologies for same-sex couples (1.6%). Conclusion Despite predominantly positive attitudes, specific resistances highlight the importance of continuous training and institutional policies. Financing No conflict.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdag002.002
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(O-02) Diversity in focus: attitudes of healthcare professionals in welcoming LGBTQIA+ individuals in a university hospital setting

Lamas Lara, S A Franceschini, S H P Okano, ACBd Oliveira et al.
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

(O-02) Diversity in focus: attitudes of healthcare professionals in welcoming LGBTQIA+ individuals in a university hospital setting

Lamas Lara, S A Franceschini, S H P Okano, ACBd Oliveira, C S Vieira
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The lack of familiarity with evidence-based terminologies and practices in LGBTQIA+ healthcare generates discomfort and conflicts in the doctor–patient relationship. This study aimed to describe attitudes, familiarity with LGBTQIA+ rights, and the ability to provide welcoming care among professionals trained in a university hospital. Methods A cross-sectional study among medical residents, preceptors, and faculty members of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School at the University of São Paulo. Duplicate responses were excluded. Results A total of 123 responses were elegible. The median age was 29 years (IQR: 27–44); 93.5% were physicians, with a median of four years since graduation (IQR: 2–19). Most respondents were residents (62.6%), female (52.0%), White (82.9%), Christian (56.1%), and single (57.7%). Almost all reported feeling comfortable with LGBTQIA+ students (n = 122). Regarding terminology use, 81.3% felt confident using it; 89.4% stated they use the social name; and 78.1% reported no difficulties with pronouns. Additionally, 87.8% supported the inclusion of LGBTQIA+ topics in formal education. On the other hand, 44.7% reported discomfort with the use of gender-neutral language; 9.8% with admitting patients to wards according to their lived gender; and 12.2% with the use of restrooms according to gender identity. Nine participants (7.3%) believed that the presence of trans women or travestis in women’s restrooms increases the risk of violence against cisgender women. Furthermore, 22.8% believed that the media can influence the development of sexual orientation or gender identity. A minority believed that the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) should not provide gender-affirming treatments (4.9%) or reproductive technologies for same-sex couples (1.6%). Conclusion Despite predominantly positive attitudes, specific resistances highlight the importance of continuous training and institutional policies. Financing No conflict.

The Journal of Sexual MedicineVol. 23(Supplement_1)
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.