Structure dependence and the syntactic expertise of ChatGPT

Abstract The paper contributes to a discussion of the syntactic expertise of ChatGPT. It focuses on its handling of the range of ‘syntactic puzzles’, such as ‘onion sentences’, ‘garden paths’, grammatical illusions and structural ambiguity. The parsing of such cases by humans dwells on the property of structure-dependence, which is not shared by the AI language generator – ChatGPT. The latter is believed to process sentences in a sequential, though not strictly linear fashion, not using either recursion or hierarchy, the two pillars of human structure dependence. The assessment of ChatGPT’s syntactic expertise is based on two experiments in which the language model is asked to interpret and judge acceptability of English examples displaying such peculiar syntax. This is preceded by ‘a training session’ in which the model’s understanding of the nuances of such cases is assessed. The outcome is then confronted with the results of two parallel questionnaire studies, with the same set of linguistic tasks, administered to a group of human respondents, untrained in linguistics, with a native-like proficiency in English.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2025-0018
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structure dependence and the syntactic expertise of ChatGPT

Przemysław Tajsner
Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Structure dependence and the syntactic expertise of ChatGPT

Przemysław Tajsner
article en

Abstract

Abstract The paper contributes to a discussion of the syntactic expertise of ChatGPT. It focuses on its handling of the range of ‘syntactic puzzles’, such as ‘onion sentences’, ‘garden paths’, grammatical illusions and structural ambiguity. The parsing of such cases by humans dwells on the property of structure-dependence, which is not shared by the AI language generator – ChatGPT. The latter is believed to process sentences in a sequential, though not strictly linear fashion, not using either recursion or hierarchy, the two pillars of human structure dependence. The assessment of ChatGPT’s syntactic expertise is based on two experiments in which the language model is asked to interpret and judge acceptability of English examples displaying such peculiar syntax. This is preceded by ‘a training session’ in which the model’s understanding of the nuances of such cases is assessed. The outcome is then confronted with the results of two parallel questionnaire studies, with the same set of linguistic tasks, administered to a group of human respondents, untrained in linguistics, with a native-like proficiency in English.

Poznań Studies in Contemporary LinguisticsVol. 62(1)
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.