Many more reasons: critical notes on Reasons for Logic, Logic for Reasons

The main aim of this critical note is to assess some of the different forms in which Hlobil and Brandom’s logical approach, as it was introduced in Reasons for Logic, Logic for Reasons, can be improved or expanded.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Studies
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-026-02483-4
Primary Topic
Advanced Algebra and Logic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Many more reasons: critical notes on Reasons for Logic, Logic for Reasons

Joaquin S. Toranzo Calderon, Agustina Borzi, Federico Pailos
Philosophical Studies
Advanced Algebra and Logic
article

Many more reasons: critical notes on Reasons for Logic, Logic for Reasons

Joaquin S. Toranzo Calderon, Agustina Borzi, Federico Pailos
article en

Abstract

The main aim of this critical note is to assess some of the different forms in which Hlobil and Brandom’s logical approach, as it was introduced in Reasons for Logic, Logic for Reasons, can be improved or expanded.

Philosophical Studies
National Technological University (AR), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), University of Tübingen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universidad de Buenos Aires, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Advanced Algebra and Logic
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.