Evaluating biosecure entry and exit protocols and education methods in a mock livestock facility
Analysis showed education Method did not influence Errors or Time during Entry or Exit. Participants made 1.37 times more Entry Errors (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.02) and 1.19 times more Exit Errors (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.17) during round 2 compared to round 1. Compared to Protocol 1, participants made 1.47 times more Errors on average during Protocol 2 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.02) and 1.87 times more during Protocol 3 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). The time to complete the entry procedures was associated with Protocol, Round and the Initial experience, but exit time was only associated with Protocol and Round.
Authors
- Krishona Martinson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-2577)
- Erin L. Cortus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-3252)
- Abby Schuft
- Sally Noll
- B. Hetchler
- K. A. Janni
Institutions
- University of Minnesota (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Veterinary Science
- Published
- 2026-02-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1724406
- Primary Topic
- Agriculture and Farm Safety
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of Minnesota