Evaluating biosecure entry and exit protocols and education methods in a mock livestock facility

Analysis showed education Method did not influence Errors or Time during Entry or Exit. Participants made 1.37 times more Entry Errors (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.02) and 1.19 times more Exit Errors (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.17) during round 2 compared to round 1. Compared to Protocol 1, participants made 1.47 times more Errors on average during Protocol 2 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.02) and 1.87 times more during Protocol 3 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). The time to complete the entry procedures was associated with Protocol, Round and the Initial experience, but exit time was only associated with Protocol and Round.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1724406
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Farm Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating biosecure entry and exit protocols and education methods in a mock livestock facility

Krishona Martinson, Erin L. Cortus, Abby Schuft, Sally Noll et al.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Agriculture and Farm Safety
article

Evaluating biosecure entry and exit protocols and education methods in a mock livestock facility

Krishona Martinson, Erin L. Cortus, Abby Schuft, Sally Noll, B. Hetchler, K. A. Janni
article en

Abstract

Analysis showed education Method did not influence Errors or Time during Entry or Exit. Participants made 1.37 times more Entry Errors (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.02) and 1.19 times more Exit Errors (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.17) during round 2 compared to round 1. Compared to Protocol 1, participants made 1.47 times more Errors on average during Protocol 2 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.02) and 1.87 times more during Protocol 3 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). The time to complete the entry procedures was associated with Protocol, Round and the Initial experience, but exit time was only associated with Protocol and Round.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 13
University of Minnesota (US)
University of Minnesota
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Agriculture and Farm Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.