Developing an Index to Measure Structural Racism: Methodological Process, Challenges, and Considerations

Access to valid and reliable measures of structural racism is essential for addressing health inequities, yet few validated ecological-level indices exist for assessing structural racism affecting Black and Hispanic populations in the United States. Guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities framework, our interdisciplinary team undertook the development of an ecological-level structural racism index. In the process, we encountered substantive methodological and data-related challenges that warrant explicit documentation. This paper describes the methodological process used to identify and select indicators of structural racism, including a modified Delphi consensus process involving social epidemiologists, health inequality researchers, community members, economic inequality specialists, and psychometricians. We outline a five-step approach for extracting and harmonizing geographic-level data from publicly available sources and discuss key challenges encountered, including limited availability of granular geographic data, insufficient data documentation guidelines, inconsistent reporting frequencies, and difficulties in adapting publicly available datasets for structural racism measurement. Rather than presenting a finalized index, this paper serves as a methodological guide and cautionary account for researchers seeking to develop ecological measures of structural racism, emphasizing the importance of transparency, adaptability, and rigorous data selection in advancing public health equity research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23020200
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing an Index to Measure Structural Racism: Methodological Process, Challenges, and Considerations

Jennifer Contreras, Ester Villalonga-Olives, Alisha Crump, Sheela Khadka et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Developing an Index to Measure Structural Racism: Methodological Process, Challenges, and Considerations

Jennifer Contreras, Ester Villalonga-Olives, Alisha Crump, Sheela Khadka, SaleneM W Jones, Bryce B. Reeve, Christopher M. Amissah, Yu-Hua Fu
article en

Abstract

Access to valid and reliable measures of structural racism is essential for addressing health inequities, yet few validated ecological-level indices exist for assessing structural racism affecting Black and Hispanic populations in the United States. Guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities framework, our interdisciplinary team undertook the development of an ecological-level structural racism index. In the process, we encountered substantive methodological and data-related challenges that warrant explicit documentation. This paper describes the methodological process used to identify and select indicators of structural racism, including a modified Delphi consensus process involving social epidemiologists, health inequality researchers, community members, economic inequality specialists, and psychometricians. We outline a five-step approach for extracting and harmonizing geographic-level data from publicly available sources and discuss key challenges encountered, including limited availability of granular geographic data, insufficient data documentation guidelines, inconsistent reporting frequencies, and difficulties in adapting publicly available datasets for structural racism measurement. Rather than presenting a finalized index, this paper serves as a methodological guide and cautionary account for researchers seeking to develop ecological measures of structural racism, emphasizing the importance of transparency, adaptability, and rigorous data selection in advancing public health equity research.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 23(2)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), Duke University (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), New York University (US), Morgan State University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.