Patterns in conflict dynamics in Yemen and Syria

Abstract Conflict fatalities tend to follow heavy-tailed statistical distributions. A 2005 fusion–fission theory predicts that, when armed groups operate through dynamically forming and fragmenting clusters, the number of fatalities per event should be approximated by a power-law distribution with exponent α near 2.5, with deviations reflecting the relative robustness of larger versus smaller fighter clusters. We use Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) event-level fatality data to estimate α in recent Yemen and Syria conflict periods during 2023–2025. These conflict event datasets are small, incomplete and imperfect and only produce very crude approximations to a power law; nonetheless, the best-fit α values occupy the range 2.5<α<3.5 across most periods, which is broadly consistent with predominantly fragmented or weakly consolidated armed-group organization. Temporary reductions in α are broadly consistent with episodes in which larger coordinated clusters become more consequential. More rigorous testing will require improved datasets to become available in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.260467
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns in conflict dynamics in Yemen and Syria

Moussa Abdou, Neil F. Johnson
1 links
Royal Society Open Science
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Patterns in conflict dynamics in Yemen and Syria

Moussa Abdou, Neil F. Johnson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Conflict fatalities tend to follow heavy-tailed statistical distributions. A 2005 fusion–fission theory predicts that, when armed groups operate through dynamically forming and fragmenting clusters, the number of fatalities per event should be approximated by a power-law distribution with exponent α near 2.5, with deviations reflecting the relative robustness of larger versus smaller fighter clusters. We use Armed Conflict Location and Event Data (ACLED) event-level fatality data to estimate α in recent Yemen and Syria conflict periods during 2023–2025. These conflict event datasets are small, incomplete and imperfect and only produce very crude approximations to a power law; nonetheless, the best-fit α values occupy the range 2.5<α<3.5 across most periods, which is broadly consistent with predominantly fragmented or weakly consolidated armed-group organization. Temporary reductions in α are broadly consistent with episodes in which larger coordinated clusters become more consequential. More rigorous testing will require improved datasets to become available in the future.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 13(11)
George Washington University (US)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon