Exclusionary Contracts and Incentives to Innovate

This paper develops a game-theoretic model to study how exclusionary contracts affect firms’ incentives to invest in innovation. Several symmetric sellers compete to supply an identical product to a set of buyers, and each seller can invest in R&D to develop a higher-quality version of the product. Prior to choosing their R&D investments, sellers may offer exclusionary contracts to buyers. In equilibrium, all buyers sign an exclusionary contract with the same seller, which eliminates rival sellers’ incentives to invest in R&D and concentrates innovative effort in a single firm. Banning exclusionary contracts increases the aggregate probability of innovation and the joint surplus of buyers and sellers only when the R&D technology exhibits sufficiently strong diseconomies of scale.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Games
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/g17010008
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exclusionary Contracts and Incentives to Innovate

Games
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Exclusionary Contracts and Incentives to Innovate

article en

Abstract

This paper develops a game-theoretic model to study how exclusionary contracts affect firms’ incentives to invest in innovation. Several symmetric sellers compete to supply an identical product to a set of buyers, and each seller can invest in R&D to develop a higher-quality version of the product. Prior to choosing their R&D investments, sellers may offer exclusionary contracts to buyers. In equilibrium, all buyers sign an exclusionary contract with the same seller, which eliminates rival sellers’ incentives to invest in R&D and concentrates innovative effort in a single firm. Banning exclusionary contracts increases the aggregate probability of innovation and the joint surplus of buyers and sellers only when the R&D technology exhibits sufficiently strong diseconomies of scale.

GamesVol. 17(1)
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), 657 Oslo (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.