Multi-Chiller Plant Under Demand Uncertainties: Predictive Versus Planned Approaches

Recently, different techniques have been proposed for the scheduling and loading problems in cooling plants with chillers in a parallel configuration. Two broad groups can be considered: the online control-based group and the offline optimization-based group. The first group is exemplified by Model Predictive Control, where the selection of control moves provides a solution to both scheduling and loading. The second group includes Optimal Chiller Loading and Optimal Chiller Sequencing algorithms. They usually derive operating plans with some lead time in a batch-like fashion for long horizons. Both groups use forecasts of important factors such as the cooling demand and ambient conditions; hence, they have to deal with inaccuracies in the forecasts. In this paper, a comparison among these two groups is made considering demand uncertainties. The severity of the uncertainty is shown to play a role in the results as well as the controller tuning in the case of the predictive approach. The results are favorable to OCS with respect to overall consumption (up to 15%) but uses more on/off changes in the chiller’s operation (double in some cases).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thermo
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/thermo6010010
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Chiller Plant Under Demand Uncertainties: Predictive Versus Planned Approaches

M. Arahal, Juana M. Martínez-Heredia, Manuel G. Satué, Alfredo P. Vega-Leal
Thermo
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Multi-Chiller Plant Under Demand Uncertainties: Predictive Versus Planned Approaches

M. Arahal, Juana M. Martínez-Heredia, Manuel G. Satué, Alfredo P. Vega-Leal
article en

Abstract

Recently, different techniques have been proposed for the scheduling and loading problems in cooling plants with chillers in a parallel configuration. Two broad groups can be considered: the online control-based group and the offline optimization-based group. The first group is exemplified by Model Predictive Control, where the selection of control moves provides a solution to both scheduling and loading. The second group includes Optimal Chiller Loading and Optimal Chiller Sequencing algorithms. They usually derive operating plans with some lead time in a batch-like fashion for long horizons. Both groups use forecasts of important factors such as the cooling demand and ambient conditions; hence, they have to deal with inaccuracies in the forecasts. In this paper, a comparison among these two groups is made considering demand uncertainties. The severity of the uncertainty is shown to play a role in the results as well as the controller tuning in the case of the predictive approach. The results are favorable to OCS with respect to overall consumption (up to 15%) but uses more on/off changes in the chiller’s operation (double in some cases).

ThermoVol. 6(1)
Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.