The many things that thing can become

Abstract Grammaticalization is often conceived of as a change from less to more grammatical, with loss of semantic content and the acquisition of a more grammatical status. However, the roles of discourse and prosody in grammaticalization processes are not often taken into consideration. This paper describes seven syntactic and two discourse functions of forms historically related to the noun meaning ‘thing’ in Sà’án Sàvǐ ñà Ñuù Xnúvíkó (Mixtepec Mixtec, Otomanguean). At the level of discourse, these forms, pervasive in unplanned speech, may function as hesitation markers and floor-keeping devices. The floor-keeping function, in turn, serves as a clause-combining device in discourse. The spoken nature of the corpus analyzed here allows us to see how information is distributed over Intonation Units (IU) and their combinations. This paper offers structural and prosodic evidence that some syntactic functions of these forms developed from discourse structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functions of Language
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24082.bel
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The many things that thing can become

Jeremías Salazar, Guillem Belmar Viernes
Functions of Language
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

The many things that thing can become

Jeremías Salazar, Guillem Belmar Viernes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Grammaticalization is often conceived of as a change from less to more grammatical, with loss of semantic content and the acquisition of a more grammatical status. However, the roles of discourse and prosody in grammaticalization processes are not often taken into consideration. This paper describes seven syntactic and two discourse functions of forms historically related to the noun meaning ‘thing’ in Sà’án Sàvǐ ñà Ñuù Xnúvíkó (Mixtepec Mixtec, Otomanguean). At the level of discourse, these forms, pervasive in unplanned speech, may function as hesitation markers and floor-keeping devices. The floor-keeping function, in turn, serves as a clause-combining device in discourse. The spoken nature of the corpus analyzed here allows us to see how information is distributed over Intonation Units (IU) and their combinations. This paper offers structural and prosodic evidence that some syntactic functions of these forms developed from discourse structures.

Functions of LanguageVol. 32(3)
Community Link (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.