Mechanisms of Digital Human-Driven Collaborative English Speaking Learning: An Interaction Hypothesis Perspective

Grounded in the Interaction Hypothesis, this study investigates the mechanisms underlying digital human-driven collaborative English speaking learning. Addressing the persistent problem of interaction fossilization in computer-supported collaborative learning, the study argues that learners’ low willingness to communicate and insufficient collaborative scaffolding often prevent peer interaction from developing into meaningful negotiation of meaning. Against this backdrop, digital human companions—characterized by multimodal interaction and enhanced social presence—are examined as potential mediators of interactional conditions conducive to second language acquisition. Drawing on interactionist theory, the study proposes a three-dimensional closed-loop interaction mechanism consisting of Pre-adaptation, Process Synergy, and Feedback Iteration. The pre-adaptation dimension calibrates learner profiles, task design, and affective readiness to establish optimal conditions for interaction. The process synergy dimension focuses on sustaining negotiation of meaning through scaffolded interaction, clarification requests, and prompts that encourage pushed output. The feedback iteration dimension embeds non-intrusive, data-driven corrective feedback and affective regulation into ongoing interaction, enabling continuous adjustment of task difficulty and interaction strategies. Theoretically, the proposed mechanism extends interactionist explanations of language learning to multimodal, human–AI collaborative environments. Practically, it offers a structured and implementable framework for designing intelligent speaking tasks that enhance interaction depth, feedback quality, and learner engagement. The study concludes that digital human companions can function as interactional facilitators rather than mere tools, supporting the transition from superficial participation to sustained, meaning-focused collaborative speaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Research and Development
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57237/j.edu.2026.01.003
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanisms of Digital Human-Driven Collaborative English Speaking Learning: An Interaction Hypothesis Perspective

Qiao Meng, Yang Yang
Education Research and Development
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Mechanisms of Digital Human-Driven Collaborative English Speaking Learning: An Interaction Hypothesis Perspective

Qiao Meng, Yang Yang
article en

Abstract

Grounded in the Interaction Hypothesis, this study investigates the mechanisms underlying digital human-driven collaborative English speaking learning. Addressing the persistent problem of interaction fossilization in computer-supported collaborative learning, the study argues that learners’ low willingness to communicate and insufficient collaborative scaffolding often prevent peer interaction from developing into meaningful negotiation of meaning. Against this backdrop, digital human companions—characterized by multimodal interaction and enhanced social presence—are examined as potential mediators of interactional conditions conducive to second language acquisition. Drawing on interactionist theory, the study proposes a three-dimensional closed-loop interaction mechanism consisting of Pre-adaptation, Process Synergy, and Feedback Iteration. The pre-adaptation dimension calibrates learner profiles, task design, and affective readiness to establish optimal conditions for interaction. The process synergy dimension focuses on sustaining negotiation of meaning through scaffolded interaction, clarification requests, and prompts that encourage pushed output. The feedback iteration dimension embeds non-intrusive, data-driven corrective feedback and affective regulation into ongoing interaction, enabling continuous adjustment of task difficulty and interaction strategies. Theoretically, the proposed mechanism extends interactionist explanations of language learning to multimodal, human–AI collaborative environments. Practically, it offers a structured and implementable framework for designing intelligent speaking tasks that enhance interaction depth, feedback quality, and learner engagement. The study concludes that digital human companions can function as interactional facilitators rather than mere tools, supporting the transition from superficial participation to sustained, meaning-focused collaborative speaking.

Education Research and DevelopmentVol. 5(1)
Department of Commerce (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.