Curricular Progression for Linear Function from Primary School: Comparing the National Curricula of Four Sub-Saharan African Countries

National curricula are among the most significant variables that determine mathematics achievement. Although the number of international curriculum comparisons is increasing, studies in sub-Saharan Africa are scarce. This study aims to identify similarities and differences in curricular progression, a systematic arrangement of objectives, concepts, contents, and thinking practices tailored to each grade level to meet curriculum goals by comparing the national curricula of four sub-Saharan African countries, namely Ethiopia, Ghana, Mozambique, and South Africa, from Grades 1 to 9. This comparison is based on an analytical framework of curricular progression for linear functions, as defined in this study. Mathematics curricula in sub-Saharan Africa are considered similar; however, the results revealed the opposite. Although Ghana and South Africa are relatively similar, the approaches to linear functions differ among the four countries. Moreover, curricular progression needs improvement in all four countries. Therefore, the curricular progression of the four countries may hinder students’ understanding of linear functions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10642-y
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curricular Progression for Linear Function from Primary School: Comparing the National Curricula of Four Sub-Saharan African Countries

Satoshi Kusaka, Akira Oshima
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Curricular Progression for Linear Function from Primary School: Comparing the National Curricula of Four Sub-Saharan African Countries

Satoshi Kusaka, Akira Oshima
article en

Abstract

National curricula are among the most significant variables that determine mathematics achievement. Although the number of international curriculum comparisons is increasing, studies in sub-Saharan Africa are scarce. This study aims to identify similarities and differences in curricular progression, a systematic arrangement of objectives, concepts, contents, and thinking practices tailored to each grade level to meet curriculum goals by comparing the national curricula of four sub-Saharan African countries, namely Ethiopia, Ghana, Mozambique, and South Africa, from Grades 1 to 9. This comparison is based on an analytical framework of curricular progression for linear functions, as defined in this study. Mathematics curricula in sub-Saharan Africa are considered similar; however, the results revealed the opposite. Although Ghana and South Africa are relatively similar, the approaches to linear functions differ among the four countries. Moreover, curricular progression needs improvement in all four countries. Therefore, the curricular progression of the four countries may hinder students’ understanding of linear functions.

International Journal of Science and Mathematics EducationVol. 24(2)
Hiroshima University (JP), Naruto University of Education (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.