“Twice Removed”: Indigenous Siberian Ethnographic Collections in U.S. Museums

ABSTRACT This paper explores the status of Indigenous ethnographic collections from Siberia—objects, photographic, and other heritage records—that were moved outside Russia to museums in the United States (North America). The collections now held at seven American museums are treated here as “twice removed,” that is, both geographically and intellectually, from their original homelands. This study is a response to the growing interest in the status of Siberian collections by museum and heritage professionals, and primarily by Siberian diaspora experts and cultural activists. Such collections are now viewed as a new resource that can help sustain heritage preservation in both home and diaspora communities and advance transnational collaboration. Sharing knowledge about Siberian ethnographic collections in Western museums is a rapidly growing activity aimed at co‐creating knowledge with Indigenous experts and at building ways to reconnect the collections, via online access and other means, with home communities and other audiences when international connections, broken since 2022, resume.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Museum Anthropology
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/muan.70032
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diverse Musicological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
198.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Twice Removed”: Indigenous Siberian Ethnographic Collections in U.S. Museums

Igor Krupnik
1 citations
Museum Anthropology
Diverse Musicological Studies
198.24
article

“Twice Removed”: Indigenous Siberian Ethnographic Collections in U.S. Museums

Igor Krupnik
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores the status of Indigenous ethnographic collections from Siberia—objects, photographic, and other heritage records—that were moved outside Russia to museums in the United States (North America). The collections now held at seven American museums are treated here as “twice removed,” that is, both geographically and intellectually, from their original homelands. This study is a response to the growing interest in the status of Siberian collections by museum and heritage professionals, and primarily by Siberian diaspora experts and cultural activists. Such collections are now viewed as a new resource that can help sustain heritage preservation in both home and diaspora communities and advance transnational collaboration. Sharing knowledge about Siberian ethnographic collections in Western museums is a rapidly growing activity aimed at co‐creating knowledge with Indigenous experts and at building ways to reconnect the collections, via online access and other means, with home communities and other audiences when international connections, broken since 2022, resume.

Museum AnthropologyVol. 49(1)
Smithsonian Institution (US), National Museum of Natural History (US)
Smithsonian Institution, American Museum of Natural History, National Museum of Natural History
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Diverse Musicological Studies
198.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.