Radical Violence and the Ontological Fragility of the Political

This article argues that radical violence allows us to understand diffuse, opaque, and ontologically corrosive forms of violence that are not confined to event-centered, instrumental or legal-judicial conceptions of violence. Rather, radical violence is performed through a malign condition of structural, epistemic, bureaucratic and algorithmic forms of rule, and not in acts of coercive violence. Drawing on phenomenology, hermeneutics and post-foundationalism, the article shows how radical violence roots itself in the world-relation, resulting in disorientation, narrative rupture, unworlding and a state of almost permanent vulnerability. Radical violence also empties the grounds of worlding and relationality, even where institutions themselves are not destroyed. The book concludes with a theoretical account of the ontological fragility of the political, wherein political worlds are sustained through fragile practices of meaning, recognition, and judgment that render them at once possible and vulnerable to radical violence. It does not offer solutions, but rather expands the conceptual vocabulary through which contemporary harm is understood as a world-altering phenomenon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18473609
Primary Topic
Political Theology and Sovereignty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radical Violence and the Ontological Fragility of the Political

Tinto Thalonikkara Devassy
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Political Theology and Sovereignty
article

Radical Violence and the Ontological Fragility of the Political

Tinto Thalonikkara Devassy
article en

Abstract

This article argues that radical violence allows us to understand diffuse, opaque, and ontologically corrosive forms of violence that are not confined to event-centered, instrumental or legal-judicial conceptions of violence. Rather, radical violence is performed through a malign condition of structural, epistemic, bureaucratic and algorithmic forms of rule, and not in acts of coercive violence. Drawing on phenomenology, hermeneutics and post-foundationalism, the article shows how radical violence roots itself in the world-relation, resulting in disorientation, narrative rupture, unworlding and a state of almost permanent vulnerability. Radical violence also empties the grounds of worlding and relationality, even where institutions themselves are not destroyed. The book concludes with a theoretical account of the ontological fragility of the political, wherein political worlds are sustained through fragile practices of meaning, recognition, and judgment that render them at once possible and vulnerable to radical violence. It does not offer solutions, but rather expands the conceptual vocabulary through which contemporary harm is understood as a world-altering phenomenon.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian Institute of Technology Indore (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Political Theology and Sovereignty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.