Who Gets to Belong in Chemistry? A Decolonization Perspective Informed by Dominant Group Theory

A sense of belonging in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is often conceptualized primarily through social dimensions, overlooking its disciplinary and epistemological contexts. In chemistry, understanding belonging requires examining how disciplinary culture, values, and norms shape who feels included and who is excluded. This perspective article explores belonging in chemistry (a STEM discipline) as a multidimensional construct, emphasizing the intersections of social, cultural, and epistemic dimensions that influence students’ participation and identity development in chemistry. Through a critical synthesis of literature informed by dominant group theory and decolonization frameworks, this work interrogates how Eurocentric definitions of merit and excellence perpetuate exclusionary practices and constrain the belonging of nondominant groups. The analysis identifies key opportunities in chemistry to support the participation of all and offers asset-based considerations for transforming departmental and instructional practices. We conclude that advancing belonging in chemistry requires reexamining disciplinary norms and adopting new approaches that validate multiple ways of knowing and contributing to the chemical sciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020238
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Gets to Belong in Chemistry? A Decolonization Perspective Informed by Dominant Group Theory

Zakiya S. Wilson-Kennedy, Rebecca Davis, Christen D. Jones
Education Sciences
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Who Gets to Belong in Chemistry? A Decolonization Perspective Informed by Dominant Group Theory

Zakiya S. Wilson-Kennedy, Rebecca Davis, Christen D. Jones
article en

Abstract

A sense of belonging in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is often conceptualized primarily through social dimensions, overlooking its disciplinary and epistemological contexts. In chemistry, understanding belonging requires examining how disciplinary culture, values, and norms shape who feels included and who is excluded. This perspective article explores belonging in chemistry (a STEM discipline) as a multidimensional construct, emphasizing the intersections of social, cultural, and epistemic dimensions that influence students’ participation and identity development in chemistry. Through a critical synthesis of literature informed by dominant group theory and decolonization frameworks, this work interrogates how Eurocentric definitions of merit and excellence perpetuate exclusionary practices and constrain the belonging of nondominant groups. The analysis identifies key opportunities in chemistry to support the participation of all and offers asset-based considerations for transforming departmental and instructional practices. We conclude that advancing belonging in chemistry requires reexamining disciplinary norms and adopting new approaches that validate multiple ways of knowing and contributing to the chemical sciences.

Education SciencesVol. 16(2)
Louisiana State University (US), The Ohio State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.