Critical Race Theory and the Law of the Sea: Bringing CRT ‘Offshore’

This article argues for the urgent need to bring critical race theory (CRT) into conversation with the international law of the sea (ILOS). CRT recognises race and law as inextricably linked, interrogating how legal systems create and uphold racial subordination. While CRT scholarship has expanded from its origins in the United States into international law, it has yet to explicitly engage with the sea. Taking literally Penelope Andrews’ 2000 call to ‘take CRT offshore’, this article underscores the importance of bringing CRT and ILOS into dialogue, highlighting three reasons why race, law and the sea must be examined together. First, race distinctly shapes experiences at sea, in ways compounded by, but not reducible to, other forces such as empire and capitalism. Second, in structuring protections and power at sea, ILOS may entrench racial subordination despite appearing neutral. Finally, the sea is a unique physical and legal space, with differences from land that demand critical attention. The article therefore calls for placing race on the agenda of ILOS, and the sea on the agenda of CRT, to expose how the law may uphold racial power offshore.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London)
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25501/soas.00874320
Primary Topic
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Race Theory and the Law of the Sea: Bringing CRT ‘Offshore’

Amanda Danson Brown
SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London)
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
article

Critical Race Theory and the Law of the Sea: Bringing CRT ‘Offshore’

Amanda Danson Brown
article en

Abstract

This article argues for the urgent need to bring critical race theory (CRT) into conversation with the international law of the sea (ILOS). CRT recognises race and law as inextricably linked, interrogating how legal systems create and uphold racial subordination. While CRT scholarship has expanded from its origins in the United States into international law, it has yet to explicitly engage with the sea. Taking literally Penelope Andrews’ 2000 call to ‘take CRT offshore’, this article underscores the importance of bringing CRT and ILOS into dialogue, highlighting three reasons why race, law and the sea must be examined together. First, race distinctly shapes experiences at sea, in ways compounded by, but not reducible to, other forces such as empire and capitalism. Second, in structuring protections and power at sea, ILOS may entrench racial subordination despite appearing neutral. Finally, the sea is a unique physical and legal space, with differences from land that demand critical attention. The article therefore calls for placing race on the agenda of ILOS, and the sea on the agenda of CRT, to expose how the law may uphold racial power offshore.

SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.