Assessment of the Swelling Potential of the Brebi, Mera, and Moigrad Formations from the Transylvanian Basin Through the Integration of Direct and Indirect Geotechnical and Mineralogical Analysis Methods

This study evaluates the swelling potential in clayey soils of the Paleogene Brebi, Mera, and Moigrad formations in the Transylvanian Basin (Romania) by integrating direct free-swelling tests (FS; STAS 1913/12-88) with indirect index-property diagrams and semi-quantitative X-ray diffraction (XRD; RIR method). The indirect analysis combines three swelling-susceptibility classification charts—Seed et al. (AI–clay), Van der Merwe (PI–clay), and Dakshanamurthy and Raman (LL–PI)—with mineralogical trends from the Casagrande plasticity chart, complemented by Holtz and Kovacs’s clay-mineral reference fields and Skempton’s activity concept (AI = PI/% < 2 µm). The geotechnical dataset comprises 88 Brebi, 46 Mera, and 263 Moigrad specimens (with parameter counts varying by test), an XRD was performed on a representative subset. The free swell (FS) results indicate that Brebi soils range from low to active behavior (50–135%) without reaching the very active class; most Brebi specimens fall in the medium-activity range. Moigrad spans the full FS spectrum (20–190%) but is predominantly in the medium-to-active range. In contrast, Mera soils exhibit predominantly active behavior, covering the full range of activity classes (30–170%). The empirical classification charts diverge systematically: clay-sensitive schemes tend to assign higher swell susceptibility than the LL–PI approach, especially in carbonate-influenced soils. XRD results corroborate these patterns: Brebi is calcite-rich (mean ≈ 53.5 wt% CaCO3) with minor expandable minerals (mean ≈ 3.1 wt%); Mera is feldspathic (orthoclase mean ≈ 55.3 wt%) with variable expandable phases; and Moigrad has a higher clay-mineral content (mean ≈ 38.8 wt%). Overall, swelling is controlled by the combined effects of clay-fraction reactivity, clay volume continuity, and carbonate-related microstructural constraints.