Mathematical and Ethical Considerations in Economics Modelling

Abstract We consider the mathematical properties of economic models concerned with value maximisation, including integrated assessment models. We illustrate how the outcomes that result from maximising value subject to convergence to a steady state in the long run may be very different from the outcomes that arise from maximising value without requiring such convergence. We contend that many economic models include an assumption (sometimes hidden) that the economy converges to a steady state in the long run, so the outcome if such an assumption does not hold true may be very different from the model predictions. We reflect on the intergenerational injustice relating to this and other ethical and mathematical considerations in economic models, in the context of environmental and social issues. We hope to encourage improved communication and awareness of modelling assumptions, and a more fundamental rethink of economic models, values and policies, given the magnitude of the risks currently faced by humanity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate Action
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-026-00338-6
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematical and Ethical Considerations in Economics Modelling

Timothy W. Hughes, Edward Branford
npj Climate Action
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
article

Mathematical and Ethical Considerations in Economics Modelling

Timothy W. Hughes, Edward Branford
article en

Abstract

Abstract We consider the mathematical properties of economic models concerned with value maximisation, including integrated assessment models. We illustrate how the outcomes that result from maximising value subject to convergence to a steady state in the long run may be very different from the outcomes that arise from maximising value without requiring such convergence. We contend that many economic models include an assumption (sometimes hidden) that the economy converges to a steady state in the long run, so the outcome if such an assumption does not hold true may be very different from the model predictions. We reflect on the intergenerational injustice relating to this and other ethical and mathematical considerations in economic models, in the context of environmental and social issues. We hope to encourage improved communication and awareness of modelling assumptions, and a more fundamental rethink of economic models, values and policies, given the magnitude of the risks currently faced by humanity.

npj Climate ActionVol. 5(1)
University of Exeter (GB)
University of Exeter
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.