ED95 of Ciprofol Combined with Esketamine or Sufentanil in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Dose-Finding and Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: This study aimed to estimate the 95% effective dose (ED95) of ciprofol when combined with esketamine or sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and to explore the associated clinical and safety profiles of these sedation strategies. Methods: This study was conducted in two phases. In Phase 1, 44 patients aged 65– 80 years undergoing ESD were randomized to receive ciprofol combined with esketamine (group E) or sufentanil (group S). Dixon’s up-and-down method was used to characterize the dose-response relationship of ciprofol, and ED95 values were derived as model-based estimates. In Phase 2, 68 patients were randomized to group E or group S. Phase 2 was designed as an exploratory randomized comparison, and intraoperative parameters, hemodynamic variables, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Results: Based on model-based analysis, the estimated ED95 of ciprofol combined with esketamine was 0.276 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.264– 0.349), while that combined with sufentanil was 0.244 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.236– 0.282). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the proportion of patients requiring rescue sedation or analgesia ( P > 0.05). Induction time was shorter in group E than in group S ( P = 0.039). During the procedure, group E showed lower incidences of hypoxia and hypotension and less fluctuation in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) compared with group S ( P < 0.05). In contrast, the time to full alertness was longer in group E than in group S ( P = 0.012). Conclusion: Ciprofol combined with esketamine or sufentanil showed different clinical and hemodynamic profiles in elderly patients undergoing ESD. These findings were derived from an exploratory analysis and should be interpreted as strategy-specific rather than evidence of superiority. The longer time to full alertness with esketamine indicates a potential trade-off. Trial Registration: Chictr.org.cn; identifier: ChiCTR2500102341. Keywords: ciprofol, esketamine, sufentanil, endoscopic submucosal dissection, elderly

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Design Development and Therapy
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s595458
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ED95 of Ciprofol Combined with Esketamine or Sufentanil in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Dose-Finding and Randomized Controlled Trial

Ilyar Mamtili, Yan Xie, Qian Liu, Hui JIANG et al.
Drug Design Development and Therapy
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

ED95 of Ciprofol Combined with Esketamine or Sufentanil in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Dose-Finding and Randomized Controlled Trial

Ilyar Mamtili, Yan Xie, Qian Liu, Hui JIANG, Xiaoxue Qin, Yaodan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to estimate the 95% effective dose (ED95) of ciprofol when combined with esketamine or sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and to explore the associated clinical and safety profiles of these sedation strategies. Methods: This study was conducted in two phases. In Phase 1, 44 patients aged 65– 80 years undergoing ESD were randomized to receive ciprofol combined with esketamine (group E) or sufentanil (group S). Dixon’s up-and-down method was used to characterize the dose-response relationship of ciprofol, and ED95 values were derived as model-based estimates. In Phase 2, 68 patients were randomized to group E or group S. Phase 2 was designed as an exploratory randomized comparison, and intraoperative parameters, hemodynamic variables, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Results: Based on model-based analysis, the estimated ED95 of ciprofol combined with esketamine was 0.276 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.264– 0.349), while that combined with sufentanil was 0.244 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.236– 0.282). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the proportion of patients requiring rescue sedation or analgesia ( P > 0.05). Induction time was shorter in group E than in group S ( P = 0.039). During the procedure, group E showed lower incidences of hypoxia and hypotension and less fluctuation in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) compared with group S ( P < 0.05). In contrast, the time to full alertness was longer in group E than in group S ( P = 0.012). Conclusion: Ciprofol combined with esketamine or sufentanil showed different clinical and hemodynamic profiles in elderly patients undergoing ESD. These findings were derived from an exploratory analysis and should be interpreted as strategy-specific rather than evidence of superiority. The longer time to full alertness with esketamine indicates a potential trade-off. Trial Registration: Chictr.org.cn; identifier: ChiCTR2500102341. Keywords: ciprofol, esketamine, sufentanil, endoscopic submucosal dissection, elderly

Drug Design Development and TherapyVol. Volume 20
Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.