Silencing Conscience

What does it take, morally and psychologically, to kill and harm others? This article argues that committing deadly violence against others requires that we repress our basic moral understanding of them and neutralize the moral significance of our actions. Indeed, it proposes that violence and evil in general are not possible without self-deception and bad faith. I use “neutralization” as a generic term for the psychological techniques we use to cover up the moral corruption of our destructive behaviors, such as dehumanizing others or denying our responsibility. Understanding neutralization as a repression of our moral understanding sheds new light on the moral-psychological dynamics of neutralization, for example, its ambivalent character, its tendency to escalate, and its self-dehumanizing nature. Moreover, the account of neutralization developed in the article provides the vantage point for a reading of the Iliad that explores the motives that drive the slaughter outside the walls of Troy, and the various psychological strategies employed by the warriors to neutralize the killing. My account of neutralization and my reading of the Iliad are developed in critical dialogue with Simone Weil’s classic essay on the Greek epic and her reflections on dehumanization in general.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Wittgenstein Review
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15845/nwr.si2026.3748
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Literary Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Silencing Conscience

Fredrik Westerlund
Nordic Wittgenstein Review
Philosophy and Literary Analysis
article

Silencing Conscience

Fredrik Westerlund
article en

Abstract

What does it take, morally and psychologically, to kill and harm others? This article argues that committing deadly violence against others requires that we repress our basic moral understanding of them and neutralize the moral significance of our actions. Indeed, it proposes that violence and evil in general are not possible without self-deception and bad faith. I use “neutralization” as a generic term for the psychological techniques we use to cover up the moral corruption of our destructive behaviors, such as dehumanizing others or denying our responsibility. Understanding neutralization as a repression of our moral understanding sheds new light on the moral-psychological dynamics of neutralization, for example, its ambivalent character, its tendency to escalate, and its self-dehumanizing nature. Moreover, the account of neutralization developed in the article provides the vantage point for a reading of the Iliad that explores the motives that drive the slaughter outside the walls of Troy, and the various psychological strategies employed by the warriors to neutralize the killing. My account of neutralization and my reading of the Iliad are developed in critical dialogue with Simone Weil’s classic essay on the Greek epic and her reflections on dehumanization in general.

Nordic Wittgenstein Review
University of Helsinki (FI)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Philosophy and Literary Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.